Tuesday, September 17, 2024

Gary Habermas on the Conversion of James, the Brother of Jesus

  

Further, how are we to account similarly for the conversion of Jesus’s skeptical brother James? Along with his family members, James’s earlier stance was apparently to reject Jesus and his message along with joining the public sentiment (hoi par’ autou) that Jesus was out of his mind (exestē, Mark 3:21, 31-35; John 7:3-5). Yet later, after he met the risen Jesus, James appears to have been converted from his early position to his subsequent leadership of the Jerusalem church.

 

Admittedly, this was a rather abrupt about-face for James—a change from thinking that his brother was mentally ill to following him even to the point of being willing to be stoned to death for his belief in him (Josephus, Ant. 20.9.1). The majority opinion among critical scholars is that the apparent and awe-inspiring changes in James was due to an appearance of the risen Jesus. This event was recorded in both the very early creedal tradition in 1 Cor 15:7 as well as narrated briefly in chapter 8 of the later, noncanonical Gospel of the Hebrews.

 

James’s move away from his previous unbelief has to be accounted for adequately both in his conversion and in his leadership position in the early church. Scarcely has anyone stated this more succinctly than critical scholar Reginald H. Fuller, who went as far as to retort, “It might be said that if there were no record of an appearance to James the Lord’s brother in the New Testament we should have to invent one in order to account for his post-resurrection conversion and rapid advance.” (Reginald H. Fuller, The Formation of the Resurrection Narratives, 2nd ed. [New York: Macmillan, 1980], 37, after citing Gal 2:1-10, 12; Acts 15:13; 21:18). Quite similarly, N. T. Wright also asserts regarding Jesus’s brother James, “it is difficult to account for his centrality and unrivalled leadership unless he was himself known to have seen the risen Jesus.” (Wright, Resurrection of the Son of God, 325. Wright likewise follows the majority view that James probably came to believe in Jesus due to a resurrection appearance [560]) (Gary R. Habermas, On the Resurrection, 4 vols. [Brentwood, Tenn.: B&H Academic, 2024], 2:460-61)

 

 

The Greek text in Mark 3:21, 31-35 is difficult in its own right, such as regarding the question of the identity of those who attempted to restrain Jesus. The Greek literally indicates that these were people nearby (hoi par’ autou), but both the way the terms are used plus Jesus seemingly ignoring his family, at least temporally (3:31-35), favors the notion that Jesus’s family agreed with this public sentiment. IT no doubt looked embarrassing for both Jesus and his family, hence raising its likelihood of authenticity. (Ibid., 460 n. 64)

 

 

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

 

 

Blog Archive