Friday, August 15, 2025

David W. T. Brattson on Absence of Expected Evidence and the Non-Use of Incense in Ante-Nicene Christianity

  

Absense of Expected Evidence


There are no references to censing in Christian worship where they are to be most expected: descriptions of the liturgy and commentaries on Scripture passages that mention incense. The earliest descriptions are Pliny the Younger’s Letter 10.96, Justin Martyr’s 1 Apology 61, 65-67, the Didache (chs. 8–10), and the Apostolic Traditior’ of Hippolytus. The only physical substances in the first three works are bread, wine and baptismal water, but it may be argued that Pliny and Justin could be expected to have omitted incense even if it had been used because of the special purposes for which their two works were written. As an investigating magistrate, Pliny was interested only in whether Christians were engaged in subversive activities or planning public disorders. He was not concerned with the fine points of rituals that did not inflict injury or disturb the peace. Silence on the subject can also be expected from Justin because he was giving a brief overview of Christian worship as part of assuring his readers in the higher echelons of government that his co-religionists did not occupy their time together in illegal or seditious activities.

 

On the other hand, at least allusions to incense are to be expected in the detailed instructions for Christian worship such as the Didache and the Apostolic Tradition, yet it is absent from both works. Indeed, in the Apostolic Tradition Hippolytus delved into such minutiae as exorcism by breathing prior to baptism, (Hippolytus, TA 20.8) liturgical use of oil, (TA 5; 21.6-8, 10, 19; 22.2) water at the Eucharist, (TA 23.3, 7) milk and honey accompanying the bread and wine at Communion, (TA 23.2) blessing of designated species of fruit, (TA 2 8.1-6) offerings of specific kinds of flowers, (TA 28.7) and blessing of cheese and olives. (TA 6) Omission of incense in such an exhaustive treatment of tangible materials in church is inexplicable if it had actually been employed. (David W. T. Brattson, “Incense in Ante-Nicene Christianity,” Churchman 117, no. 3 [2003]: 227-28)

 

Blog Archive