Monday, September 27, 2021

Numbers 4:49 and "By the Hand of" Not To Be Taken at Face Value

In Num 4:49, we read:

 

According to the commandment of the Lord they were numbered by the hand of Moses (בְּיַד־מֹשֶׁ֔ה), every one according to his service, and according to his burden: thus were they numbered of him, as the Lord commanded Moses.

 

While not impossible, I doubt that Moses alone numbered the 8,580 men from v. 48. This shows us that "by the hand of 'x'" does not mean literally, but it has also the sense of doing an action on behalf of someone (in this case, Moses) (cf. "by the hand of Abraham").

Is the "Heart" Always Deceitful? Not According to Paul in Romans 6:17

In Rom 6:17, we read:

 

But thanks be to God that though you were slaves of sin, you became obedient from the heart (καρδια) to that form of teaching to which you were committed. (NASB)

 

Calvin, in his commentary on Romans, wrote the following on this verse:

 

You have obeyed from the heart, etc. Paul compares here the hidden power of the Spirit with the external letter of the law, as though he had said, "Christ inwardly forms our souls in a better way, than when the law constrains them by threatening and terrifying us." Thus is dissipated the following calumny, "If Christ frees us from subjection to the law, he brings liberty to sin." He does not indeed allow his people unbridled freedom, that they might frisk about without any restraint, like horses let loose in the fields; but he brings them to a regular course of life. —Though Erasmus, following the old version, has chosen to translate it the "form" (formam) of doctrine, I have felt constrained to retain type, the word which Paul uses: some may perhaps prefer the word pattern It seems indeed to me to denote the formed image or impress of that righteousness which Christ engraves on our hearts: and this corresponds with the prescribed rule of the law, according to which all our actions ought to be framed, so that they deviate not either to the right or to the left hand.

 

From Matthew Henry’s (Reformed) commentary, we read:

 

You have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine which was delivered to you, v. 17. This describes conversion, what it is; it is our conformity to, and compliance with, the gospel which was delivered to us by Christ and his ministers.--Margin. Whereto you were delivered; eis hon paredothete--into which you were delivered. And so observe, First, The rule of grace, that form of doctrine--typon didaches. The gospel is the great rule both of truth and holiness; it is the stamp, grace is the impression of that stamp; it is the form of healing words, 2 Tim. i. 13. Secondly, The nature of grace, as it is our conformity to that rule. 1. It is to obey from the heart. The gospel is a doctrine not only to be believed, but to be obeyed, and that from the heart, which denotes the sincerity and reality of that obedience; not in profession only, but in power--from the heart, the innermost part, the commanding part of us. 2. It is to be delivered into it, as into a mould, as the wax is cast into the impression of the seal, answering it line for line, stroke for stroke, and wholly representing the shape and figure of it. To be a Christian indeed is to be transformed into the likeness and similitude of the gospel, our souls answering to it, complying with it, conformed to it--understanding, will, affections, aims, principles, actions, all according to that form of doctrine.

 

The Lutheran Formula of Concord (1577), IV: Good Works, referenced Rom 6:17 thusly:

 

16] But in this connection the following distinction must also be noted, namely, that the meaning must be: necessitas ordinis, mandati et voluntatis Christi ac debiti nostri, non autem necessitas coactionis (a necessity of Christ's ordinance, command, and will, and of our obligation, but not a necessity of coercion). That is: When this word necessary is employed, it should be understood not of coercion, but only of the ordinance of the immutable will of God, whose debtors we are; thither also 17] His commandment points that the creature should be obedient to its Creator. For in other places, as 2 Cor. 9:7, and in the Epistle of St. Paul to Philemon 14, , also 1 Pet. 5:2, that is termed of necessity which is wrung from one against his will, by force or otherwise, so that he acts externally for appearance, but nevertheless without and against his will. For such specious [hypocritical] works God does not want [does not approve], but the people of the New Testament are to be a willing people, Ps. 110:3, and sacrifice freely, Ps. 54:6, not grudgingly or of necessity, but are to be obedient from the heart, 2 Cor. 9:7; Rom. 6:17. 18] For God loveth a cheerful giver, 2 Cor. 9:7. In this understanding and in such sense it is correctly said and taught that truly good works should be done willingly or from a voluntary spirit by those whom the Son of God has made free, even as it was especially for [confirming] this opinion that the disputation concerning the voluntariness of good works was engaged in by some.

 

I know some will say, “But Jeremiah says the heart is deceitful and cannot be trusted!!!!” To see why this is based on eisegesis, see the following in response to Eric Johnson:

 

Answering An Illogical Attempt to Refute the Claim LDS are "Christian" and an Appeal to Jeremiah 17:9

1890 Reprint of Charlotte Haven's Letters

The following is a link to the transcription of (non-LDS) Charlotte Haven’s letters while in Nauvoo (they are of importance for the Book of Abraham and the Kinderhook Plates):


"A Girl's Letters From Nauvoo," Overland Monthy and Out West Magazine 16, no. 96 (December 1980: 616-38

 

 

Sunday, September 26, 2021

Wilfrid J. Harrington on the use of "I am" (εγω ειμι) in Mark 14:62

The phrase εγω ειμι ("I am") only appears 3 times in Mark (6:50; 13:6; 14:62). The latter is coupled with Jesus presenting Himself as the "Son of Man" figure from Dan 7 who is the recipient of worship in both the Greek and original Aramaic (see Is Jesus given λατρευω?; cf. Chris Kugler on Daniel 7:13-14)

 

And Jesus said, I am (εγω ειμι): and ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.

 

Catholic New Testament scholar and priest Wilfrid J. Harrington offered the following commentary on the use of “I am” by Jesus in this text:

 

“I am.”

 

The silence of Jesus (14:61) in face of the high priest’s challenge that he respond to the charges of the witnesses (14:56-59), a silence carefully underlines (“but he was silent and did not answer”, v 61), is dramatic preparation for the solemn confession of v. 62. The high priest was forced to take direct action; his question and Jesus’ answer form the heart of this passage (14:53-65). Thoroughly Marcan, these verses are a high point of his christology. The titles “Christ” and “Son of God” stand in the hearing of the gospel (1:1). The high priest now ironically bestowed them on Jesus (Son of the Blessed is equivalently Son of God). When Jesus was acknowledged as Messiah at Caesarea Philippi he enjoined silence (8:30). But now Jesus himself, positively and publicly, acknowledged that he is the Messiah, and that he is indeed the Son of God. He did so on his own terms, in terms of “Son of Man”. With his firm “I am” he made, for the first and only time, an explicit messianic claim. He could do so because now there was no risk of triumphalist misinterpretation: he was manifestly a suffering Messiah (see 8:31). Use of “the Blessed One” and “the Power,” though not really practical Jewish terminology, did, for Mark, provide a “Jewish” colouring. His “you will see” refers to the Christian perception of Jesus “ the right hand of God” by resurrection and “coming with the clouds of heaven” at the parousia. (Wilfrid J. Harrington, Mark: Realistic Theologian—The Jesus of Mark [rev ed.; Dublin: The Columba Press, 2002], 119)

 

Mark's Christology is much higher than many believe it to be. For more on the Christology of Mark, see:

Julie M. Smith on Mark's Christology and Jesus as God in the Garden of Eden

High Christology and the Baptism of Jesus in the Synoptic Gospels

Peter M. Head on the High Christology of Matthew's Account of Jesus' Walking on the Water (cf. Mark 6:45-52, another pericope in Mark where Jesus says εγω ειμι)

Saturday, September 25, 2021

Happy 6,000th Post!

I set up this blog in August 2014. This post is the 6,000th post! I would like to thank everyone who has followed this blog over the years, and here is to another 6,000 posts


I shared before that when I started this blog in August 2014, I thought my enthusiasm for blogging would fizzle out after a few weeks. Flash forward over 7  years and I am still blogging, and hopefully such will continue.


In addition to blogging, this year alone I have published three books:


"Born of Water and of the Spirit": The Biblical Evidence for Baptismal Regeneration (Amazon)


"Do This in Memory of Me": A Biblical and Historical Analysis of Roman Catholic Dogmatic Teachings Concerning the Eucharist and Sacrifice of the Mass (Amazon)


Rightly Guided by Mormonism: A Defense of the Restored Gospel of Jesus Christ and a Refutation of Christina Darlington’s Misguided by Mormonism (Amazon)


For those who wish to support my writing/research, feel free to donate via Paypal



Herman Bavinck on Different "Causes" in Salvation

The following from Herman Bavinck (1854-1921) shows us that a distinction between different “causes” (something I discussed in “Born of Water and of the Spirit”: The Biblical Evidence for Baptismal Regeneration):

 

The Reformed confessed wholeheartedly [with the Anabaptists] that the Word alone was insufficient unto regeneration and conversion, and that a special, almighty, direct operation of the Holy Spirit must accompany the Word in order to bring the sinner from death to life. (Herman Bavinck, Saved by Grace: The Holy Spirit’s Work in Calling and Regeneration [trans. Nelson D. Kloosterman; Grand Rapids, Mich.: Reformation Heritage Press, 2008], 79)

 

And yet, this same Bible, which ascribes such great power to the Word, on the other hand, teaches just as decisively and clearly that this Word alone is not sufficient, that it is but an instrument in the hand of the almighty God. Salvation, both in its acquisition and in its application, is God’s work and His alone.

 

This is declared repeatedly in the Old Testament, even though, given the contrast with the then-operative legal dispensation, the Old Testament most often describes human regeneration and renewal as a benefit of the New Covenant. The Lord is the One who gives ears to hear, eyes to see, and a heart to understand (Deut. 29:4); He is the One who sets the heart free (Deut. 30:6); He it is who writes His law upon the inner heart (Jer. 31:32), and who removes the heart of stone and replaces it with a new heart and a new spirit (Ezek. 36:26).

 

But all of this is taught with greater clarity and distinctness in the New Testament. No one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is regenerated, and that regeneration comes from God, for it is the fruit of the operation of the Holy Spirit (John 3:3, 5). If therefore someone comes to Christ and believes in Him, that is due to the Father having drawn and instructed that person (John 6:44-45), for no one can say that Jesus is Lord except by the Holy Spirit (1 Cor. 12:3). When Peter confesses Jesus to be the Christ, that was revealed to him not by flesh and blood, but by the Father in heaven (Matt. 16:17). When Paul fell down in worship before Jesus on the road to Damascus, that is to be ascribed to the good pleasure of God who desired to reveal His Son in him (Gal. 1:16). When Lydia listened to the word spoken by Paul, her heart was opened for that purpose by the Lord (Acts 16:14). When God keeps the things of His kingdom hidden from the wise and understanding, and reveals them to children, the cause thereof lies solely in the good pleasure of God (Matt. 11:25-26). (Ibid., 157-58)

 

Michael Vlach on the use of Psalm 45 in Hebrews 1:8-9

Heb 1:8-9 is a text that is very problematic for many traditional theologies. Here, Psa 45, originally addressed to a Davidic King, is called “God” but, at the same time, he has a God above him, i.e, the Father, even after the ascension and his exaltation. Numerically, there are not just two divine persons, but two Gods, one greater than the other.

 

To see an example of how desperate some Trinitarians are to get around and explain Psa 45 and its use in Heb 1:8-9, consider the following (which does not address the “marriage” theme in Psa 45 and its implications, and God having a God, and other considerations):

 

Hebrews 1:8-9 / Psalm 45:6-7

 

Hebrews 1 extols the superiority of Jesus in several ways. Particularly striking is verses 8-9 where God the Father refers to Jesus as God:

 

But of the Son He says,

“YOUR THRONE, O GOD, IS FOREVER AND EVER,
AND THE RIGHTEOUS SCEPTER IF THE SCEPTER OF HIS KINGDOM.
“YOU HAVE LOVED RIGHTEOUSNESS AND HATED LAWLESSNESS;

THEREFORE GOD, YOUR GOD, HAS ANOINTED YOU

WITH THE OIL OF GLADNESS ABOVE YOUR COMPANIONS.”

 

The writer is quoting, Psalm 45:6-7. But does Psalm 45, in its context, support the claim of Hebrews 1:8-9 that Jesus is God?

 

Psalm 45, a maskil of the sons of Korah, celebrates the marriage of a King: “I address my verses to the King” (v. 2). Some believe the psalm was directed to Solomon or another king in the Davidic line. The psalm does speak of marriage (vv. 10-15) and the King having sons (v. 16).

 

Yet the language of this psalm is very exalted, so much so that it seems to go beyond a mere human king. This King is “fairer than the sons of men” (v. 2a). He is one who possesses “splendor” and “majesty” (vv. 3-4a). His “name” will “be remembered in all generations,” and “the peoples will give You thanks forever and ever” (v. 17). Most striking is 6a which declares, “Your throne O God, is forever and ever.” The Septuagint and most English translations understand this in the vocative sense of the King being called or named, “God.” Guthrie observes that “the punctuation and syntax of the MT [Masoretic Text] support the reading ‘Your throne O God’” (18). The term for “God” is elohim, which is used over 2,300 times for the God of the Bible. Simon Chi-Chung Cheung notes that “Ps 45 takes pains to show that the Israelite king shares many of the attributes, even the title, of the Israelite God”  (19). So the psalm’s exalted language and use of elohim point to this King being divine.

 

The best candidate for Psalm 45 is the divine Messiah. The Targum of Psalm 45:2 says, “Your beauty, O King Messiah.” A divine understanding of the ultimate Davidic King seems to be the case in Psalm 2 where the nations are called to worship God’s King and Son—“Do homage to the Son” (v. 12a; v. 6). With Psalm 110:1, David’s “Lord, “ the Messiah, shares the throne of deity with God the Father. For the King of Psalm 45 to be a divine being is possible. The writer of Hebrews certainly connected Psalm 45:6-7 with Jesus’ deity.

 

So does the writer of Hebrews quote Psalm 45:6-7 contextually? The answer is likely, Yes. A divine Messiah is in view in Psalm 45, and the writer of Hebrews drew upon this truth. This appears to be a case where a NT writer draws upon an OT and that the coming Messiah is divine. (Michael Vlach, The Old in the New: Understanding How the New Testament Authors Quoted the Old Testament [The Woodlands, Tex.: Kress Biblical Resources/Sun Valley, Calif.: The Master’s Seminary Press, 2021], 119-20)

 

Blog Archive