Monday, February 26, 2024

Baptismal Regeneration in the Theology of Didymus the Blind (c. 313 – 398)

  

Original Sin and Baptism

 

To Didymus the fall of the first parents in the sin of old (παλαια αμαρτια), from which Jesus cleansed us in His baptism in the Jordan (De Trin. 2,12). All the children of Adam have inherited it by transmission (κατα διαδοχην) through the intercourse of their parents. This is why Jesus, born of a Virgin, has not been stained with it (Contra Man. 8).

 

Speaking of the effects of baptism, he mentions both the negative and the positive aspect, the cleansing from original sin and all its consequences as asl from personal guilt and the adoption as children of God:

 

The Holy Spirit as God renovates us in baptism, and in union with the Father and the Son, brings us back from a state of deformity to our pristine beauty and so fills us with His grace that we can no longer make room for anything that is unworthy of our love; He frees us from sin and death and from the things of the earth; makes us spiritual men, sharers in the divine glory, sons and heirs of God and of the Father. He conforms us to the image of the Son of God, makes us co-heirs and His brothers, we who are to be glorified and to reign with Him; He gives us heaven in exchange for earth, and bestows paradise with a bounteous hand, and makes us more honorable than the angels; and in the divine waters of the baptismal pool extinguishes the inextinguishable fire of hell (De Trin. 2, 12).

 

For when we are immersed in the baptismal pool, we are by the goodness of God and the Father and through the grace of His Holy Spirit stripped of our sins as we lay aside the old man, are regenerated and sealed by His by his own kingly power. But when we come up out of the pool, we put on Christ our Saviour as an incorruptible garment, worthy of the same honor as the Holy Spirit who regenerated us and marked us with His seal. For as many of you, says Holy Scripture, as have been baptized in Christ have put on Christ (Gal. 3, 27). Through the divine insufflation we had received the image and likeness of God, which the Scripture speaks of, and through sin we had lost it, but now we are found once more such as we were when we were first made: sinless and masters of ourselves (De Trin. 2, 12).

 

Baptism is absolutely necessary for salvation. Not even the perfection of a faultless life can make up for it: 'No one not regenerated by the Holy Spirit of God and marked with the seal of His sanctification has attained heavenly gifts, even through the perfection of a faultless life in all the rest' (De Trin. 2, 12). The only exception to the indispensability of the baptism of water is the baptism of blood, which is also the work of the Holy Spirit: 'Those who suffered martyrdom before baptism, having been washed in their own blood, were vivified by the Holy Spirit of God' (ibid.). he sums up the effects of baptism on the soul as follows: 'thus, renovated in baptism, we enjoy the familiarity of God, in so far as the powers of our nature permit, as someone has said: In so far as mortal man can be likened to God' (ibid.). (Johannes Quasten, Patrology, 4 vols. [Westminster, Md.: Christian Classics, Inc., 1992], 3:97-98)

 

Sunday, February 25, 2024

Review of the Trent Horn/James White Debate on Sola Scriptura

Tonight I reviewed the Trent Horn/James White debate on Sola Scriptura from last week. I was joined by Travis Anderson (LDS) and Bradley and Brady Crum (non-LDS; in the case of the former, ex-LDS):


Review of the Trent Horn/James White Debate on Sola Scriptura




Lee Martin McDonald on Missing Authoritative Books in the Old Testament

  

Besides the Law, it appears that several other religious texts also informed the faith and life of early Israelite history after the fifth century BCE. These other texts, for example, include several lost religious texts circulating in Israel well before, during, and after the time of Josiah’s reform in 621 BCE and they apparently had some affect as religious texts on the Jewish people until around the fifth to fourth centuries. These lost books include:

 

A. In the Law or Torah: Books of the Wars of the Lord (Num 21:14)

 

B. In Joshua, Judges, and 1-2 Samuel, 1-2 Kings:
1. Book of Jashar (Josh 10:12-13; 2 Sam 1:18-27; 1 Kgs 8:12-13 in LXX)
2. Book of the Annals of the Kind of Judah (1 Kgs 14:19; 15:7, 23; 22:45; 2 Kgs 8:23; 12:18; 14:18; 15:6, 36; 16:19; 20:20; 21:17, 15; 23:28; 24:5)

3. Book of the Annals of the Kings of Israel (1 Kgs 14:19; 15:31; 16:5, 14, 20, 27; 22:39; 2 Kgs 1:18; 10:34; 13:8, 12; 14:15, 28; 15:11, 15, 21, 26, 31)

4. Book of Acts of Solomon (1 Kgs 11:41)

 

C. In Chronicles, Ezra, and Nehemiah:

1. Book of the Kings of Israel (1 Chr 9:21; 2 Chr 20:34)

2. Book of the Kings of Judah and Israel (2 Chr 16:11)

3. Book of Kings of Israel and Judah (2 Chr 27:7)

4. Annals of the Kings of Israel (2 Chr 33:18)

5. Records of the seer Samuel (1 Chr 29:29)

6. Records of the seer Gad (1 Chr 29:29)

7. Records of the seer Nathan (1 Chr 29:29)

8. History of the Prophet Nathan (1 Chr 29:29)

9. Prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite (2 Chr 9:29)

10. Visions of the seer Iddo (2 Chr 9:29)

11. Records of the Prophet Shemaiah and the seer Iddo (2 Chr 12:15)

12. Annals of Jehu the son of Hanani (“which are recorded in the Book of the Kings of Israel”; 2 Chr 20:34)

13. Records of the seers (2 Chr 33:19)

14. Story of the prophet Iddo (2 Chr 13:22)

15. Commentary on the Book of the Kings (2 Chr 24:27)

16. A book written by the prophet Isaiah son of Amoz containing the history of Uzziah (2 Chr 26:22)

17. A vision of the prophet Isaiah son of Amoz in the Book of Kings of Judah and Israel (2 Chr 32:32; cf. Isa 1:1)

18. Annals of King David (1 Chr 27:24)

19. Annals of your ancestors (Ezra 4:15)

20. Book of the Annals (Neh 12:23)

21. Additional book: “Laments” in 2 Chr 35:25 is not a reference to Lamentations, but rather to a book evidently produced for or by Josiah that is now lost.

 

Most of these references come after the Josiah reforms and the exile, but some are earlier and show that various unknown religious and historical texts played an influential role in the life of ancient Israel before, during, and after Josiah. . . . These books are all now lost, but they were evidently authoritative books in ancient Israel. It appears that these informed the authoritative collection of written texts before, during, and after the reforms of Josiah. It is difficult to draw any conclusions about these lost books since we do not know what was in them, though we have some broad indication from the citations of the book of Jashur, but more importantly, the references to prophets and seers are about those who were perceived to receive from God and communicate to the people the will and word of God. (Lee Martin McDonald, The Formation of the Biblical Canon, 2 vols. [London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2017], 1:128-29)

 

Paul Barnett on James Interpreting "The Dwelling of David" as a reference to the Temple

  

In essence, James handed down a judgment in support of the argument of Peter and Paul against the circumcision party. James perceived that through Peter and Paul God had been calling out Gentiles adding them to his people, without the necessity of circumcision. Here James saw the words of the prophets finding their fulfilment.

 

After this I will return,
and I will rebuild the dwelling of David, which has fallen;
I will rebuild its ruins,
and I will set it up,
that the rest of men may seek the Lord,
and all the Gentiles who are called by my name,
says the Lord, who has made these things known form of old. (Acts 15:16-18)

 

It has been shown that this is not merely a straightforward quotation of the Septuagint text of Amos 9:11-12; James has also added to that text nuances from other “prophets.” Moreover, within this scriptural citation is also to be found its interpretation. In this intertextual use of scriptural passages, James is following methods of exegesis that have become well known to us from the Qumran scribes. Subtle allusions to isolated words and catch phrases in this citation point to clusters of passages from the prophets that affirm the inclusion of the Gentiles.

 

The “dwelling of David” is the temple God promised through Nathan to David, that David’s son “would build” (2 Sam 7:11-16). . . . Clearly, James perceived “the dwelling of David,” the “new temple” of God, to be located in Jerusalem in the living members of the believing community (see also Acts 21:20). (Paul Barnett, Jesus and the Rise of Early Christianity: A History of New Testament Times [Downers Grove, Ill.: IVP Academic, 1999], 290, 291, emphasis in bold added)

 

Further Reading:


Listing of Articles relating to Amos 9, "Tabernacle/Temple/Booth of David," and the "Temple of Solomon" Issue

Pre-existence of the soul in the theology of Didymus the Blind (c. 313 – 398)

  

Anthropology

 

The influence of Origen can be seen in the doctrine of the human soul. Although quite a few passages seem to imply that man consists of only body and soul (De Spir. S. 54; In Ps. 1520 BC), others show that Didymus, following Origen and Plato, believed in three principles and made a real distinction between the rational soul (νους), the animal soul (ψυχη) and the body (φυσις) (De Spir. S. 54, 55, 59; De Trin. 1,9; 1,15; 3,31).

 

He follows Origen also in his ideas of the origin of the soul. He is convinced that the soul has been created but shares his predecessor’s error that it existed before the body in which it was enclosed in punishment for sins committed (Enarr. in Epist. Petr. I, 1; De Trin. 3,1). (Johannes Quasten, Patrology, 4 vols. [Westminster, Md.: Christian Classics, Inc., 1992], 3:99)

 

Saturday, February 24, 2024

Lee Martin McDonald on Luke 24:44

  

Luke 24:44 is the only NT reference to three parts in the Jewish Scriptures, but there is nothing in the text to suggest that it included other books that were later included in the collection of Writings in the Tanak. However, some of those later designated Writings are cited in the NT as “prophetic” scriptures, e.g., Matt 24:15 citing Dan 9:27 and Jesus’ citation of Dan 7:13 in Mark 14:62. However, Leiman, Beckwith, and Bruce contend that “psalms” in this passage refers to the first book of the Writings that is not representative of that whole collection of the Writings. There is, however, no NT evidence that supports that assertion and there is no evidence that a three-part canon existed in the NT era or that the later third part began with the Psalms. These scholars impose a later notion that emerges only in the rabbinic era, but it cannot be demonstrated earlier. The Psalms were important in their own right and could easily have been given their own place of prominence in any collection of Scriptures. After all, the Psalms were among the three most frequently cited Scriptures in the NT (Isaiah, Psalms, and Deuteronomy), as well as at Qumran, and in the early churches. Also, there were more copies of the Psalms scrolls (thirty-six or thirty-seven) discovered at Qumran than any other book of the HB. . . . had all of the books of the HB had been formed as a fixed collection of scriptures before the first century CE, it is remarkable that the Christians, who adopted the scriptures of their first-century CE Jewish siblings in the first century, also welcomed other books than those that were later included in the HB, as in the cases of the Wisdom of Solomon, 1 Enoch, Sirach, and others. (Lee Martin McDonald, The Formation of the Biblical Canon, 2 vols. [London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2017], 1:277, 285)

 

Scriptural Mormonism Podcast Episode 52: Kevin Christensen on King Josiah and the Deuteronomistic Reformation

 

Episode 52: Kevin Christensen on King Josiah and the Deuteronomistic Reformation






Blog Archive