Wednesday, April 26, 2017

δικαιοω in the LXX not being merely declarative

Notwithstanding their attempt to argue for the historical Protestant view of justification, one Protestant scholar wrote that, even in legal/forensic contexts, the LXX’s use of δικαιοω is not merely declarative:

In the Greek version of the OT, the cognate verb dikaioō did not imply a legal fiction, but recognizing one as righteous, including in forensic contexts (cf. Gen 44:16; Isa 43:9, 26; Ezek 44:24): judges must not “acquit the guilty” (Exod 23:7), but must “justify,” i.e., pronounce righteous, the innocent (Deut 25:1). God himself would punish the guilty but “justify” and vindicate the righteous (1 Kgs 8:32; 2 Chr 6:23); he himself was “justified,” or “shown to be right,” when he pronounced just judgment, even against the psalmist (Ps 51:4, in Rom 3:4). (Craig S. Keener, Romans [Eugene, Oreg.: Cascade Books, 2009], 28)



Blog Archive