Tuesday, August 31, 2021

John Piper on Good Works in the Realm of Processional Sanctification vs. Naïve Misreadings of Isaiah 64:6

Commenting on works done within the realm of processional sanctification, John Piper refutes the popular but naïve misreading of Isa 64:6:

 

God Works in Us What Is Pleading to Him

 

One of the clearest statements in the New Testament that God causes the obedience of believers is Hebrews 13:20-21:

 

May the God of peace who brought again from the dead our Lord Jesus, the great shepherd of the sheep, by the blood of the eternal covenant, equip you with everything good that you may do his will, working in us that which is pleasing in his sight, through Jesus Christ, to whom be glory forever and ever. Amen.

 

Five observations make this an amazing statement of blood-bough, new-covenant obedience in the lives of believers.

 

First, the writer draws our attention to “the blood of the eternal covenant.” It is the means by which God raised Jesus from the dead. “By the blood of the eternal covenant” modifies “brought again from the dead our Lord Jesus.” Through the perfection of the finished work on the cross, God glorifies Christ with resurrection (as Paul says in Phil. 2:9). Thus, all the triumphs of the resurrection and everything God achieves through the risen Christ is blood bought.

 

Second, having raised Jesus by his own covenant blood, God now equips believers “with everything good” to do his will. This everything good is like the all things in Romans 8:32, where God did not spare his own Son but gave him for us, and thus guaranteed all things that the elect need to endure trial, be conformed to Christ, and be glorified. The same reality is in the writer’s mind here in Hebrews 13:21. God will equip you with all you need to do his will.

 

Third, this equipping is so decisive and effective that the writer goes beyond the statement of God’s providing equipment to do God’s will, and says God actually does his will in us. May God “equip you with everything good that you may do his will, working in us that which is pleasing in his sight.” The word for do (ποιησαι) is the phrase “do his will” is from the same verb as the word work (ποιων) in the phrase “working in us.” So it sounds even more striking: “May God equip you with everything good that you may do his will, doing in us that which is pleasing in his sight.” Just as we saw with Titus in 2 Corinthians 8:16-17, God’s doing his will in us is not a replacement for our dong it, but a gift of our doing it. We act the miracle. He causes it.

 

Fourth, God “[works] in us that which is pleasing in his sight, through Jesus Christ.” This circles back to the first part of verse 20, where Jesus was raised by means of his blood and was installed as “the great shepherd of the sheep.” So whether we focus on the efficacy of his blood, the implications of his resurrection, or on the daily help and care of our great shepherd, the point is that God works his will in us “through Jesus Christ.” Without the blood, the resurrection, and the shepherding of Jesus, there would be no Christian obedience.

 

Fifth, the text ends with the ultimate purpose for why God does it this way: “[He works] in us that which is pleasing in his sight, through Jesus Christ, to whom be glory forever and ever. Amen.” God works his will in us through Jesus Christ so that Jesus will get the glory for our obedience and everything that led to it. This is another expression of the ultimate goal of providence—the glorification of Christ through the transformation of his people.

 

What is clear from Hebrews 13:20-21, and from Paul’s application of the new covenant of the life of believers in 2 Corinthians 3, is that the transformation that God demands from his people is not just predestined concerning them (Rom. 8:29), and promised to them (Ezek. 36:27), and purchased for them (Titus 2:14), but is also performed in them (Heb. 13:21). God’s providence prevails from predestined obedience to accomplished obedience. (John Piper, Providence [Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway, 2020], 641-43)

 

Further Reading


Are Good Works Always "Filthy/Menstrual Rags"? Not According to John Calvin


Alphonsus Liguori on the Absurdity of the Calvinist Interpretation of Isaiah 64:6



and

Blog Archive