Wednesday, March 11, 2026

Strack and Billerbeck on "Blood of the Covenant" Originally Referring to the blood of circumcision

  

Ordinarily “blood of the covenant” דם ברית was understood to refer to the blood of circumcision.

 

Jerusalem Talmud Yebamot 8.9A.5: Whoever has pulled forth the foreskin (and thus made his circumcision unrecognizable), whoever is born circumcised and whoever had himself circumcised before his conversion to Judaism, one must make the blood of the covenant drip from him (by cutting into the site of circumcision). R. Simeon b. Eleazar (ca. 190) taught, “The schools of Shammai and Hillel were not of different opinions about the fact that one must make the blood of the covenant drip from one who is born circumcised, because his foreskin is pressed down. They were of different opinions concerning the proselyte who converts to Judaism already circumcised; for the school of Shammai said that one must make the blood of the covenant drip from him, whereas the school of Hillel said that one did not have to do this.”—Parallel passages include t. Šabb. 15.9 (133); y. Šabb. 19.17A.39; b. Šabb. 135A; b. Yebam. 71A; Gen. Rab. 46 (29B). (Hermann L. Strack and Paul Billerbeck, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Midrash, ed. Jacob N. Cerone, 4 vols. [trans. Andrew Bowden and Joseph Longarino; Bellingham, Wash.: Lexham Press, 2022], 1:1140)

 

Blog Archive