Wednesday, May 3, 2023

Michael S. Heiser on the Language of Incomparability in the Hebrew Bible

  

But what about the second half of the statements of Deut 4.35 (אין עוד מלבדו)? Must the phrasing be construed as a denial of the existence of all other gods except YHWH? There are several difficulties with this understanding.

 

First, similar constructions are used in reference to Babylon and Moab in Isa 47.8, 10 and Nineveh in Zeph 2.15. In Isa 47.8, 10, Babylon says to herself,‎ אני ואפסי עוד ("I am, and there is none else beside me"). The claim is not that she is the only city in the world but that she has no rival. Nineveh makes the identical claim in Zeph 2.15 (אני ואפסי עוד). In these instances, these constructions cannot constitute the denial of the existence of other cities and nations. The point being made is very obviously incomparability.

 

Second, מלבדו and other related forms, (לבד, לבדו) need not mean "alone" in some exclusive sense. That is, a single person in a group could be highlighted or focused upon. 1 Kgs 18.1-6 is an example. The passage deals with the end of the three-year drought and famine during the career of Elijah. After meeting with Elijah, Ahab calls Obadiah, the steward of his house, and together they set upon a course of action to find grass to save their remaining horses and mules. Verse 6a then reads:‎ אחאב הלך בדרך אחד לבדו ועבדיהו הלך בדרך־אחד לבדו ("Ahab went one way by himself [לבדו], and Obadiah went another way by himself [לבדו]"). While it may be possible to suggest that Obadiah literally went through the land completely unaccompanied in his search, it is preposterous to say that the king of Israel went completely alone to look for grass, without bodyguards or servants. The point is that לבדו (and by extension מלבדו) need not refer to complete isolation or solitary presence. Another example is Ps 51.6 [Eng., 51.4], which reads in part: לך לבדך חטאתי ("against you, you alone, I have sinned"). God was not the only person against whom David had sinned. He had sinned against his wife and certainly Uriah. This is obviously heightened rhetoric designed to highlight the One who had been primarily offended. It was God against whom David's offense was incomparable. (Michael S. Heiser, "Does Deuteronomy 32:17 Assume or Deny the Reality of Other Gods?," The Bible Translator 59, no. 3 [July 2008]: 144-45)

 

Blog Archive