Friday, November 29, 2024

W. D. Davies and Dale C. Allison on the Appearance of Moses and Elijah on the Mount of Transfiguration

  

Why are Moses and Elijah mentioned? Probably because they are the two OT figures who encountered God on Sinai/Horeb. But Moses and Elijah have most often in Christian exegetical history been taken to represent, respectively, the law and the prophets—which leads to the conclusion that in Jesus the Messiah and Son of God the law and the prophets are surpassed or fulfilled and confirmed. Such an interpretation would help account for Matthew placing Moses before Elijah: this accords with the fixed formula, ‘the law and the prophets’ (cf. 5:17; 7:12). We cannot, however, be at all sure that this interpretation was intended by the author of our gospel, especially as Elijah was not a writing prophet. And there are still other suggested interpretations. Thrall (v), for instance, suspects that Moses and Elijah are mentioned in order to show that Jesus—the only one to rise from the dead—is greater than both (cf. vv. 5–6); and Pamment (v) has claimed that both Moses and Elijah, like Jesus, were rejected by the people but vindicated by God. Others have begun with the fact that Moses and Elijah are also paired in Jn 1:21 (Moses indirectly); Rev 11:3 (probably); and Midr. Rab. on Deut 10:1—all three times as eschatological figures. Even though the pairing is infrequent, the two figures are naturally associated. They were both wonder-workers. Both suffered. Both were prophets. Both were connected with the law. Both were, according to tradition, spared death, and (perhaps) both were expected to return. It has therefore seemed natural to many to discern their significance for the transfiguration by interpreting them together, sometimes as eschatological figures. But Liefeld (v), p. 173, may be correct to contend that whereas Moses’ rôle is primarily typological, that of Elijah is primarily eschatological (cf. 17:9–13). The appearance of Moses confirms the Exodus theme while the appearance of Elijah gives the whole scene an eschatological dimension. There is yet another possibility, seemingly neglected by exegetes. If, according to the Pentateuch, Moses’ face became lit up on Sinai, Elijah was, in Jewish tradition, associated with fire and light. Not only did the prophet call down fire from heaven and ascend in a fiery chariot, but this is found in Liv. Proph. Elijah 2–3: ‘When he was born, his father Sobacha saw that men of shining white appearance were greeting him and wrapping him in fire, and they gave him flames of fire to eat, and he went and reported this in Jerusalem and the oracle told him: “Do not be afraid, for his dwelling will be with light and his word judgement …” ’. Perhaps Elijah is named in Mt 17:3 par. because he, like Jesus and Moses, also had had his appearance transfigured into light. (W. D. Davies and Dale C. Allison Jr., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel according to Saint Matthew, 3 vols. [International Critical Commentary; London: T&T Clark International, 2004], 2:697–699)

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Blog Archive