Sunday, June 28, 2026

B. Hudson McLean on the Eucharist being a Sacrifical Meal in the Theology of 1 Corinthians

  

Though the Eucharist took the form of a congregational meal in the first-century church (for example, 1 Cor. 11:17-22), it was often interpreted as a sacrificial meal shared out among the congregation. (B. Hudson McLean, “The Place of Cults in Voluntary Associations and Christian Churches on Delos,” in Voluntary Associations in the Graeco-Roman World, ed. John S. Kloppenborg and Stephen G. Wilson [London: Routledge, 1996], 216)

 

 

For example, Paul's contrast of the Christian sacrificial meal with the sacrificial meals of the Graeco-Roman sacrifice suggests that he is describing not only a real, but superior sacrifice, in which the human-divine relationship was truly strengthened by a slaying. Just as the latter truly made the worshipers partners with demons, so the Christian sacrifice brings about an actual partnership with the Christ (1 Cor. 10:16--21). Similarly, the reference of Ignatius of Antioch to a Christian altar implies that the Eucharistic meal had sacrificial meaning: "Be careful, then, to observe a single Eucharist. For there is one flesh of our Lord, Jesus Christ, and one cup of his blood that makes us one, and one altar ... " (Ignatius, Phil. 4.1-2); "Run off- all of you- to one temple of God, as it were, to one altar ... " (Ignatius, Magn. 7.2). (B. Hudson McLean, “The Place of Cults in Voluntary Associations and Christian Churches on Delos,” in Voluntary Associations in the Graeco-Roman World, ed. John S. Kloppenborg and Stephen G. Wilson [London: Routledge, 1996], 224 n. 143)

 

Blog Archive