Friday, December 19, 2014

Athanasius Supporting Extra-Biblical Concepts and Terms vs. the formal sufficiency of Scripture

Writing on whether it is proper for Athanasius to use extra-biblical terms such as “same substance” (homoousios):

“But,” they [the Arians] say, “all this is not written: and we reject these words as unscriptural.” But this again, is an unblushing excuse in their mouths. For if they think everything must be rejected which is not written, wherefore, when the Arian party invent such a heap of phrases, not from Scripture, “out of nothing,” and “the Son was not before His generation,” and “Once He was not,” and “He is unalterable,” and “The Father is ineffable and invisible to the Son,” and “the Son knows not even His own essence,” and all that Arius has vomited in his light and irreligious Thalia, why do not they speak against these, but rather take their part, and on that account content with their own fathers? And, in what Scripture did they on their part find “Unoriginate,” and “the term essence,” and “there are three subsistences,” and “Christ is not very God,” and “He is one of the hundred sheep,” and “God’s Wisdom is ingenerate and without beginning, but the created powers are many, of which Christ is one?” or how, when in the so-called Dedication, Acacius and Eusebius and their fellows used expressions not in Scripture, and said that “the First-born of the creation” was “the exact Image of the essence and power and will and glory,” do they complain of the Fathers, for making mention of unscriptural expressions, and especially of essence? For they out either to complain of themselves, or to find no fault with the Fathers.

Taken from Athanasius, Councils of Ariminum and Selucia, 36 in Schaff, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers series II, vol. 4 p. 470.

The above quotation, one of many similar comments by Athanasius, should be carefully considered when apologists for sola scriptura claim Athanasius held to the formal sufficiency of the biblical texts. Not only should one be careful with the supposed biblical “proof-texts” one hears offered for any given position, one must also be weary of eisegesis being performed on a patristic author.

Blog Archive