As John Dehlin has released his 8-part interview with Dan Vogel, I think it is apropos to plug this great article by Kevin Christensen which shows jus some of the many problems with Vogel's interpretive (really just eisegesis) skills of the Book of Mormon and how the case for Book of Mormon historicity is much greater than what Vogel lets on:
Truth and Method: Reflections on Dan Vogel's Approach to the Book of Mormon (PDF)
Truth and Method: Reflections on Dan Vogel's Approach to the Book of Mormon (PDF)
