Friday, March 11, 2022

The Very Low View of Marriage in Comparison to Celibacy in the Eastern Tradition

  

Marriage as a sacred reality

 

In calling marriage a mysterion, the Orthodox tradition confirms the sanctity of this institution. This point is fundamental since, from its earliest times, Christianity has always struggled with an internal belief that <<devalued>> marriage (J. Chryssavgis, <<Love and Sexuality>>, 109; H. Crouzel, <<Marriage and virginity>>; G. Khodre, <<A Great Mystery>>, 31-32). This particular trend attributed <<a moral and cultural supremacy>> (P. Brown, <<The Notion>>, 427) to the ascetic ideal of virginity and absolute continence. In certain moments, it even abhorred marriage as <<a concession of flesh>>, <<an unavoidable evil necessary for reproduction>> and <<nothing more than a function of society>> (G. Khodre, <<A Great Mystery>>, 31-32). For this reason, most of the married persons who have been canonised by the Orthodox Church were distinguished for their continence.

 

In different degrees, this line of thought was lauded and endorsed by several great Orthodox figures: Ephrem of Syria (c. 306-373) considered sexual abstinence as normative for married couples after baptism; Basil of Caesarea (330-379) wrote that the married state is a definite distraction from the contemplative life; Gregory of Nyssa (335-395) believed that divine love cannot be achieved without chastity; Alexios, the Man of God (c. 380-440) abandoned his bride on the wedding day for the sake of asceticism; Patriarch Luke Chrysoberges (1156-1169) gave a penance to those newlyweds who came together that night after Holy Communion; Gregory Palamas (1296-1359) wrote that even lawful sexual pleasure is not a divine gift of God; Simon of Thessalonica (1381-1429) upheld that the perfect goals of the Gospel are virginity and incorruptibility, and that marriage did not belong to the period of grace but was blessed by Christ only as a merciful accommodation to human weakness; Epiphanius of Athens (1930-1989) believe that the primary obligation of married couples was to struggle in the arena of universal command, just like celibate persons (Basil of Caesarea, Homilia in Psalmum 45, 8; G. Khodre, << A Great Mystery>>, 32-33; T. Stylianopoulos, <<Towards a Theology>>, 249, 270; N. Milosevic, To Christ, 93; J. Meyendorff, <<Christian marriages>>, 99-100; R. Murray, Symbols, 17-18; E. Theodoropoulos, Counsels, 155, 160; E.M. Walsh, <<Saint Gregory>>, 211-213; A. Sterk, <<Renouncing the World>>; B. Gain l’Église, 108). (Kevin Schembri, Oikonomia, Divorce and Remarriage in the Eastern Orthodox Tradition [Kanonika 23; Valore, Italy: Pontificio Instituto Orientale, 2017], 30-31)

 

Blog Archive