Saturday, December 9, 2023

Michael Hundley on Exodus 20:3 teaching, Not Strict Monotheism, but Monolatry

  

Demanding that Israel have no other gods before him (Exod. 20:2 [3]) is not a statement of monotheism, but rather of commitment. Yahweh must come first, which even could be read as a statement of priority, not exclusivity. However, when read alongside other prohibitions, the monolatrous implications are clear. In the immediately following verses (20:3-4 [4-5]), Yahweh forbids making any images for worship because he is a “jealous god.” (In fact, Yahweh’s self-proclaimed jealousy bookends the Sinai legislation in 20:4 [5] and 34:14) He then qualifies his statement by forbidding images of gods, which is the primary method of accessing them (20:19 [23]). The text later extends the terms of a taboo on speaking the names of other gods (23:13) and making a covenant with other deities (23:32). (Exod. 34:15-16 prohibits making a covenant with foreign people because doing so will lead to non-Yahwistic worship) Just as their names must not be spoken, so too much their cultic apparatuses be destroyed (23:24). (Michael Hundley, Yahweh Among the Gods: The Divine in Genesis, Exodus, and the Ancient Near East [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022], 311-12)

 

Blog Archive