Thursday, April 18, 2024

Robert P. Miller on Manuel Miguens' Interpretation of John 2:4 and τι εμοι και σοι

After discussing the relevant texts in the Old Testament, and interacting with the work of Manuel Miguens, Mary the Servant of the Lord an Ecumenical Proposal:


The study presented by Miguens is correct in some aspects but is deficient in other areas. Miguens's conclusion regarding Hebrew rhetorical questions is correct. Obvious statements are presented as questions. If the statement to the question is affirmative, the question contains a negative. If the obvious answer is a negative, the question does not contain a negative particle. But since this is true, then Miguens comes to an incorrect conclusion regarding the meaning of the idiom τι εμοι και σοι. Jesus' response to his mother using the rhetorical question τι εμοι και σοι must expect a negative answer. I have demonstrated this in my study of Hebrew rhetorical questions. I have shown that the interrogative particle מָה may function as a negative in rhetorical questions. Furthermore, my study has shown that when the idiom מַה-לְּ contains two objects of the preposition, such as in the idiom מַה-לִּי וָלָךְ, then the two objects are always placed at a distance from each other. This is true even if an adversative conjunction (και or ו) is not present. The two objects are never united in opposition to a third party or situation. (Robert P. Miller, "Τι εμοι και σοι: John 2:4—Rebuke or Expression of Mutual Concern?" [PhD dissertation; The Catholic University of America, 2009], 120; see pp. 54-120 for an interaction with the Old Testament passages and the arguments of Miguens on how such relates to John 2:4)

 

Blog Archive