Saturday, January 30, 2016

Alan Kerr on the divine name being given to Jesus

Jn 17:11–12 speaks of the Father’s name, which he has given to the Son. The previous discussion has demonstrated that the most likely name is ἐγὼ εἰμι. This name pervades the Gospel of John both in its predicative and absolute forms. It has further been argued that this name is intimately associated with the Hebrew name יהוה, and once that linkage is allowed then one can see how ἐγὼ εἰμι undergirds the Johannine Christology, which is climatically summarized in Thomas’s confessional statement before the risen Jesus: ‘Ο κύριός μου καὶ θεός μου (20:28). Jesus is one with Yhwh. Jesus has effectively been given the name יהוה by the Father.
This is also the name the Jewish high priests carried on their foreheads, engraved in gold. For Jesus it is not engraved in gold; it is given not ἐπʼ αὑτῷ, but rather ἐν αὑτῷ or בקרבו as the mt describes the giving of the name of God to the angel of Yhwh (Exod. 23:21) (discussed above, 9.5.7). For the high priests there was a sense in which the name יהוה was external—they wore it as part of their priestly attire—whereas for Jesus the name was part and parcel of who he was. It is because of this that Shirbroun is right when he says that the name the Father gives the Son cannot be given to the disciples. It belongs to Jesus by virtue of who he is—it cannot be passed on to his disciples in the same sense in which he has been given it.

Nevertheless he does have the name יהוה, and in having it, not just upon him, but within him as it were, he is the fulfilment of the high priest. (Kerr, A. (2002). The Temple of Jesus’ Body: The Temple Theme in the Gospel of John (Vol. 220, p. 335). New York, NY: Sheffield Academic Press.)

Blog Archive