Perhaps the most difficult statement in John 12 occurs in v. 41: Isaiah said this because he saw Jesus’ (lit. ‘his’, but the most natural antecedent is Jesus; but see below) glory and spoke about him. . . It means that in his vision Isaiah saw (the pre-incarnate) Jesus. But there is a slightly different possibility. Targum Jonathan (an Aramaic paraphrase) to Isaiah 6:1 reads not ‘I saw the Lord’ but ‘I saw the glory of the Lord’, while the Targum to Is. 6;4 reads not ‘the King, the Lord of hosts’ but ‘the glory of the shekinah of the King of the ages, the Lord of hosts’. It may be necessary to appeal to the Targum; even in the Hebrew text Isaiah 6:3 already speaks of God’s glory. If instead we are to take the pronoun, as in the NIV, to refer to Jesus’ glory then John is unambiguously tying Jesus to Yahweh the Lord of hosts the Almighty—Isaiah saw Jesus in some pre-incarnate fashion . . . What is remarkable, on this rendering of the passage, is the statement that Isaiah saw Jesus glory. This may be no more than the conclusion a chain of Christian reasoning: If the Son, the Word, was with God in the beginning, and was God, and if he was God’s agent of creation, and the perfect revelation of God to humankind, then it stands to reason that in those Old Testament passages where God is said to reveal himself rather spectacularly to someone, it must have been through the agency of his Son, his Word, however imperfectly the point was spelled out at the time. Therefore Isaiah said those words because (a stronger reading than ‘when’, AV) he saw Jesus’ glory.(D.A. Carson, The Gospel According to John [Nottingham, England: Apollos, 1991], 449-50)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2016
(825)
-
▼
January
(59)
- Response to "Is the Book of Mormon Credible?"
- Were Apostolic Oral Traditions Retired after the N...
- James McGrath, Did Jesus Exist?
- How not to argue against “Socinian” Christology
- A.E. Harvey on the Concept of Agency
- Latter-day Saints not being bound by Scripture Alone
- Alan Kerr on the divine name being given to Jesus
- D.A. Carson on John 12:41
- Use of "sacrifice" in Didache 14:1-3 and the Eucha...
- Alan Kerr on John 4:24
- Max Thurian on the True Humanity of Jesus
- Cecil Andrews on Mormonism and the nature of a "Cult"
- Note on the text of John 5:3b-4
- "The Lord" in Malachi 3:1
- Ephesians 4:5-7 as a non-Trinitarian Text
- Introductory Bibliography on the Parables of Jesus
- Does Genesis 19:24 support the Trinity?
- Gospel of John vs. "no-Lordship" salvation theories
- Blake Ostler on the Hosts of Heaven and Species Un...
- Another dilemma for Trinitarian Theology
- Some notes on the Nephites and the Law of Moses
- Does Acts 13:48 teach Predestination?
- Repentance as a Gift from God to Man
- Does D&C 68:3-4 teach Prophetic Infallibility?
- Patrick Mason on OD-1 and Fallibility of Leaders
- "Bible" in the Letter of Aristeas and the Book of ...
- Does the Book of Mormon teach an incorporeal God?
- Does Alma 34:32-34 conflict with posthumous salvat...
- Insights into John 20:23
- Hebrews 9:27 and Posthumous Salvation
- BDAG on εις in Acts 2:38
- More on the "interpretive ειμι" and the Last Suppe...
- [Saving] Faith Alone vs. Faith working through love
- Joseph Smith Worship? Responding to Criticisms of ...
- Pre-Christian Messianic Expectations and the Book ...
- Ephesians 2:8-9 and the referents to "that" (τουτο)
- Was Polygamy *necessary* for exaltation between 18...
- Is Genesis 1:26 evidence for the Trinity in the Ol...
- Additional Notes on 1 Corinthians 1:17 and baptism
- Nigel Turner on Colossians 1:16
- Irenaeus vs. the perpetual virginity of Mary
- Robinson and Garrett on D&C 82:7
- Refuting the "Aramaic has no word for 'cousin'" ar...
- Polysemous nature of the term "God" in The Recogni...
- Εως ου in the Apostolic Fathers
- Brant Gardner on Questionable Book of Mormon Archa...
- Jimmy Akin's Opening Statement to The Priesthood D...
- The LDS Priesthoods: Resource Page
- Hebrew and Greek lexical sources on דברה and ταξις...
- Chris VanLandingham on Philippians 3:9
- Λογιζομαι in texts contemporary with the New Testa...
- Another note on απαραβατος in Hebrews 7:24
- John 14:28 and the relationship between the Son an...
- More biblical evidence against the "Gentile" inter...
- Λογιζομαι in texts contemporary with the New Testa...
- 1 Cor 5:9-10 and the "missing books of the Bible" ...
- The myth of the impeccability and infallibility of...
- Jonah 3:9-10 and free will
- Jonah, Nineveh, and the contingent nature of prophecy
-
▼
January
(59)