James Stutz vs. Matt Slick on Spiritual Experiences

In a post earlier from today, I discussed how Reformed apologists such as Scott Oliphant and Norman Geisler ground their belief in the truth of the Bible on spiritual experiences, similar to the "Mormon testimony" (cf. Moroni 10:3-5) (click here). James Stutz, a fellow LDS apologist, has an article refuting Matt Slick and his hypocrisy on the issue of praying about the Book of Mormon in an article, "Having his cake and eating it too: Matt Slick," James discusses Slick's own testimony and how incredibly subjective it is. Not surprising, considering Slick's pathetic exegetical abilities.