Wednesday, December 21, 2016

1 Clement was not Trinitarian in Theology

1 Clement 65:2 reads as follows:

The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you, and with all everywhere that are the called of God through Him, by whom be to Him glory, honor, power, majesty, and eternal dominion, from everlasting to everlasting. Amen.

Commenting on this passage, one commentator on patristic Christology wrote:

In these passages the “glory, dominion,” etc., are expressly ascribed to God, either absolutely and without reference to Christ, as in the first and second instances, or through Jesus Christ, as in the last two. In one of the remaining instances we have simply, “Chosen by God, through Jesus Christ our Lord, to whom be glory forever and ever”; and in the other a similar construction. If the ascription here is to be referred to the nearer, and not, as is possible, to the remoter antecedent by a negligence of syntax of which there are known examples in the New Testament and in the writings of Christian antiquity, there is no difficulty in reconciling it with the supremacy of the Father, so strongly asserted, or necessarily implied, in the current language of the Epistle. The Scriptures ascribe glory and dominion to Christ, but a derived glory and dominion. God having “made him both Lord and Christ,” and “given him a name above every name.” With this the language of the Epistle is throughout consistent. (Alvan Lamson, The Church of the First Three Centuries: or, Notices of the Lives and Opinions of the Early Fathers, With Special Reference to the Doctrine of the Trinity; Illustrating Its Late origin and Gradual Formation, p. 8)



Blog Archive