25. Arius then raves in saying that the Son is from nothing, and that once He was not, while Sabellius also raves in saying that the Father is Son, and again, the Son Father, in subsistence One, in name Two; and he raves also in using as an example the grace of the Spirit. For he says, ‘As there are "diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit," so also the Father is the same, but is dilated into Son and Spirit.' Now this is full of absurdity; for if as with the Spirit, so it is with God, the Father will be Word and Holy Spirit, to one becoming Father, to another Son, to another Spirit, accommodating himself to the need of each, and in name indeed Son and Spirit, but in reality Father only; having a beginning in that He becomes a Son, and then ceasing to be called Father, and made man in name, but in truth not even coming among us; and untrue in saying ‘I and the Father,' but in reality being Himself the Father, and the other absurdities which result in the instance of Sabellius. And the name of the Son and the Spirit will necessarily cease, when the need has been supplied; and what happens will altogether be but make-belief, because it has been displayed, not in truth, but in name. And the Name of Son ceasing, as they hold, then the grace of Baptism will cease too; for it was given in the Son. Nay, what will follow but the annihilation of the creation? for if the Word came forth that we might be created, and when He was come forth, we were, it is plain that when He retires into the Father, as they say, we shall be no longer. For He will be as He was; so also we shall not be, as then we were not; for when He is no more gone forth, there will no more be a creation. This then is absurd. (Athanasius, Four Discourses Against the Arians, Discourse IV from Nicene Post-Nicene Fathers second series, 4:443)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2016
(825)
-
▼
December
(66)
- Matthew Bowen on Nephi's wordplay on the name "Jos...
- Mario Lopez's Baptism Page
- Does Cornelius Help Refute Baptismal Regeneration?
- Defending Sola Scriptura by Poisoning the Well
- D.H. Williams on James White's use of patristic so...
- Was Joseph Smith's theology influenced by the writ...
- Who Holds the Keys? (Pope or Prophet)
- Bibliography on the Papacy and Papal Infallibility
- The Temple Veil and the Need for a Mediator
- Staples/White debate on Sola Scriptura
- The works of Walter Martin: Scholarly or a joke?
- Anti-Mormon Evangelical being full of Christmas cheer
- The implications of Acts 11:28 for Sola Scriptura
- Happy Christmas to all!
- Another Evangelical Apologist shoots himself in th...
- Christ's baptism is NOT imputed to the believer
- Scott C. Esplin on the reception history of D&C 87
- Robust Deification and 2 Peter 1:4
- Refutations of Jeff Durbin and Apologia Radio
- Note on Hebrews 6:4
- Did Jesus ascribe the entire Torah to Moses?
- Jesus’ interpretation of the Shema was NOT Trinita...
- Responding to a critic on Tertullian's Christology
- Karl Keating lying about Mormonism
- Walter Kasper on the danger of downplaying the tru...
- Ignatius of Antioch and Esoteric Teachings among t...
- 1 Clement was not Trinitarian in Theology
- James White and Jeff Durbin "respond"
- Answering an objection about the Patristics and th...
- Daniel C. Peterson's review of Decker's Complete H...
- Jaxon Washburn's critique of sola scriptura
- Videos for the 2016 Temple on Mount Zion Conference
- Initial thoughts on the White/Durbin Response to m...
- Why Latter-day Saint Christianity is True but Evan...
- Raymond Brown on John 1:1c
- Craig Evans, Jesus and the Exorcists: What We Lear...
- Robert Vukich embarrasses Matt Slick
- Margaret Barker - "Theosis & Divinization"
- Michael Licona and the problem of forced harmonisa...
- Brian Hales Refutes Dan Vogel on Polyandry
- Jeff Lindsay on Gordon B Hinckley and Mark Hofmann
- Mark Hausam vs. Greg Bahnsen on sola scriptura
- The NET on Genesis 3:5, 22
- 2016 First Presidency’s Christmas Devotional
- Athanasius Affirming Baptismal Regeneration
- The Significance of Exemplars for the Interpretati...
- Anti-Mormon Delusion vs. Reality
- James McGrath discussing Christology with Anthony ...
- The Grammar of Mark 16:16 and Baptismal Regeneration
- Michael Kruger on Petrine Authorship of 2 Peter
- The Cessation of Special Revelation and Sola Scrip...
- Answering the claim Mary is New Ark of the Covenant
- “After all we can do” (2 Nephi 25:23) and Origen
- A recent (and stupid) assertion about the Interpre...
- More on Sola Scriptura being a Shell-Game
- John C. Peckham on Malachi 3:6-7 and Numbers 23:19
- Moses' "worship" of Jethro
- Korpel and de Moor on "Likeness" in Genesis 1:26
- Tarik Lacour: Mormonism through the eyes of a Blac...
- Answering an Evangelical's abuse of Matthew 16:18
- Were All Modern Catholic Doctrines Present in the ...
- Refuting Jeff Durbin on Mormonism and the Atonement
- Jesus and His earliest followers were Cultists!
- The Resurrection Evidence That Changed a Generatio...
- Marvin Vincent on Ephesians 2:3
- Blake T. Ostler, The Gospel of Grace in the Writin...
-
▼
December
(66)