Gerry Matatics, a former Presbyterian who is now a Sedevacantist (the "Home Aloner" type) debated with Matt Slick of CARM. The first discussion was on Roman Catholicism broadly (e.g., justification; sola scriptura; status of the Apocrypha/Deutero-canon, etc):
Roman Catholicism Open discussion, 4/3/2018
The second debate (available on Gerry Matatics' facebook page [not on youtube at the time of writing]) was on justification.
While I disagree with Matatics on many issues, one has to declare him the winner (by a mile) over Slick--Slick engaged in special pleading, double standards, and other fallacies as well as eisegesis, similar to his debate with Robert Sungenis where Slick got destroyed.
Roman Catholicism Open discussion, 4/3/2018
The second debate (available on Gerry Matatics' facebook page [not on youtube at the time of writing]) was on justification.
While I disagree with Matatics on many issues, one has to declare him the winner (by a mile) over Slick--Slick engaged in special pleading, double standards, and other fallacies as well as eisegesis, similar to his debate with Robert Sungenis where Slick got destroyed.
