Saturday, November 16, 2024

Joseph Duhr (1946) on the Bodily Assumption of Mary and the Development of Dogma in Catholicism

  

The Conditions of Dogmatic Progress

 

In order that a revealed truth can be proposed by the Church to the faith of believers and become the object of a dogmatic definition, two conditions must be fulfilled. It is necessary, first, that the Church by a quasi-intuitive process, either dialectic or practical, discover that this truth is really contained in the doctrine or the institutions transmitted by the Apostles. In the careful and balanced judgment of Father de Grandmaison, “there is no need to look for an exact proportion between the dogmatic definitions and the research made, the motives alleged, by those who in the name of God declare them. Sometimes, it is true, the implicit existence of the dogma in the deposit will be made clear by research; at other times it will not be so, and the dogma will appear only as a probable or morally certain interpretation of the explicit data of faith. It is the infallible Church which assures us that this interpretation is the only right one; and then, as regards us, there is truly doctrinal development in the full sense of the word. The Church, which has never claimed the power to add to revelation, has solemnly vindicated her right to define it infallible. The reasons alleged by the instruments of the magisterium so little measure this infallibility, that theologians admit the possibility of error in the grounds laid down for a definition of faith.” (L. de Grandmaison, Le dogme chrétien, Paris, 1928, pp. 263s.) This intuition—we repeat—does not depend on theological or historical science, is the privilege which comes from the Holy Spirit enlightening and guiding the Church always. The Church is a social and supernatural entity, which develops and grows under the very pressure of the divine life her Founder has endowed her with. (Joseph Duhr, The Glorious Assumption of the Mother of God [trans. John Manning Fraunces; London: Burns Oates, 1950], 4-5)

 

 

In order that a truth can be proposed to our faith by the Church, a second condition. It is necessary that in the light of the Holy Spirit, who enlightens an guides her, the Church discern the truth not only as revealed but as an integral part of the economy of our salvation as something revealed for its own sake. Christianity can be defined as the manifestation of the Holy Trinity made to redeem men by the Son of God made man. (Ibid., 6-7)

 

 

Only the Church holds the deposit of faith and reveals to us its hidden treasures under the impulse of the Holy Spirit and the needs of the moment. Again, in order that a dogmatic truth may be imposed on our faith under pain of rashness, it suffices that the Church by her ordinary magisterium teach it to the faithful by attaching it to the deposit of faith at any given moment, even after centuries of apparent silence. And the mere fact that the Church proposes a truth for our belief guarantees for us, better than any historical proof whatsoever, that it is contained in the Apostolic revelation, at least in germ. So, if one wished to know whether the bodily Assumption of Mary makes up part of this primitive revelation and whether, at the same time, it is capable of dogmatic definition, it is sufficient to ask whether now the Church teaches it to the Christian world as a true to be believed by her ordinary magisterium. (Ibid., 118 n. 42)

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Blog Archive