Monday, November 18, 2024

Joseph Duhr et al. on the lack of patristic witness to the Bodily Assumption (vs. Martin Jugie)

  

Josef Pohle, following Scheeben, declares that in the first five centuries there is no indication of belief in the Assumption of Mary, neither in literature nor in Christian monuments: “There is a void that no bridge spans whereby we might reach the observed and witnessed event.” (Pohle, Lehrbuch d. Dogmatic, t. II [1909], p. 293) The notable attempt, undertaken by Father Jugie, the renowned orientalist, to fill up this regrettable gap, (Jugie, “La Mort at l’Assomption de le Sainte Vierge dans la Tradition des cinq premiers siècles,” Echos d’Orient, 1926 & 1927) is condemned and rejected by a scientific criticism, severe but just. (Cf. Cavallera, “A Propos d’une enquête patristique sur l’Assomption,” Bulletin de littérature ecclésiastique, 1926, p. 97. Also, Rivière, “Questions mariales d’actualité,” Revue des sciences Religieuses, t. XII [1932], pp. 78-81) Thus concludes the survey drawn up by Jean Rivière: “For the good of his thesis the author, who promises a long historical and dogmatic work, where the Assumption will be studied under every aspect, will do well to abandon the testimony of the first five centuries, as did his predecessors, or to establish it on surer foundations.” (Rivière, loc. cit., p. 81) (Joseph Duhr, The Glorious Assumption of the Mother of God [trans. John Manning Fraunces; London: Burns Oates, 1950], 15)

 

 

Father Jugie had taken account of these critics and has given up basing belief in the Assumption on history. But as far as we can see, it is impossible to follow the author further when he tries to derive the Assumption from the dogma of the Immaculate Conception. Our work, concerned on another plane, does not allow us to give a detailed criticism at the moment of the work of the eminent orientalist, otherwise so richly documented. A sketch of its main outlines will be found in Father Charles Balic’s article “De definibilitate assumptionis B. Virginis in caelum,” Antonianum, t. XXI (1926), p. 3-67. (Ibid., 119-20 n. 4)

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Blog Archive