Thursday, November 2, 2023

Overview of the Debate Concerning the Authorship of 2 Peter

  

The main objections can be listed in the following way:

 

·       The Greek style and vocabulary are considered too sophisticated for some one of Peter’s Galilean origins.

·       An apostle of Peter’s stature would not have used material from the Letter of Jude in his own work . . .

·       The style, vocabulary, and themes are too different from 1 Peter to allow for common authorship.

·       The intense concern for the delay of Christ’s return best fits the era after the apostles had died.

·       The reference to Paul’s writings on a par with “scripture” (3:16) best fits a period after Peter’s death, when Paul’s writings had been collected and were beginning to function as authoritative apostolic testimony.

 

When taken together these objections present considerable challenges to Peter’s authorship, and a majority of scholars today conclude that 2 Peter was written in Peter’s name after his death by one of his disciples. Still, some scholars continue to argue that Peter is most probably the author of the letter, and each of the objections to Peter’s authorship can be answered.

 

·       Many argue that over the course of twenty years of ministry, Peter could have attained the level of proficiency in Greek that we find in 2 Peter. Close analysis indicates that the author was not a native Greek speaker.

·       It is not implausible that Peter reworked material from another respected early Church figure (Jude).

·       To account for the differences in style between 1 Peter and 2 Peter, Se. Jerome proposed that Peter may have used two different secretaries, each of whom had some latitude in word choice and literary style. Some scholars continue to find this explanation persuasive.

·       The concern about the delay of Christ’s return could also fit the late-apostolic period of the 60s when the first generation of Christians was beginning to pass away. This does not rule out authorship by Peter.

·       Some scholars argue that 2 Peter does not place Paul’s writings on a part with Scripture but simply asserts that the false teachers are twisting Paul’s letters just as they twist the Scriptures. (Daniel Keating, First and Second Peter, Jude [Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture; Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 2019], 128-29)

 

Blog Archive