Wednesday, August 16, 2023

Gerard Van Groningen on "the Lord" in Malachi 3:1

  

The identification of hā’ādôn (the Lord) with the mal’ak haběrit (the messenger of the covenant) should not surprise the reader and student of the Old Testament. Although there are references to various covenants in the Old Testament, there is basically one comprehensive covenant Yahweh made with his people. The covenant with Abraham, with Israel at Sinai, with Israel on the banks of the Jordan, with David, with the remnant, and the new covenant of Jeremiah—all are administrations of the one life and love bond Yahweh had established with mankind from the time of creation. And there is but one basic Communicator, Executor, Developer, Administrator, and Consummator of this covenant: the mal’ak Yhwh (angel of Yahweh), ‘ebed yhwh (Servant of Yahweh), and bar-‘ěneš (Son of man) in preceding chapters, we repeatedly saw that an identification of Yahweh and the angel/Servant/Son of man clearly is intended, (Among the many beneficial references are those to the themes of the angel of Yahweh or the Lord [Gen.], the Servant of the Lord [esp. in Isaiah], and the Son of Man [Dan. 7]) as well as that the one Yahweh is often set forth as two persons. In addition, the angel/Servant/Son of man is described, one time as human, another time as divine. The dual nature clarifies the distinction between Yahweh and the angel/Servant/Son of man and at the same time indicates the identity of the two—both are one and the same divine Yahweh. The angel/Servant/Son of man is none other than the promised māšîaḥ (Messiah). Malachi, though not using this Hebrew epithet, is, nevertheless, referring to him. And this Messiah, who repeatedly is referred to as the Mediator of the covenant, is the very One who carries out the promises and the curses of that covenant. Both of these, the promise and the curse, are referred to in 3:2-5. (Gerard Van Groningen, Messianic Revelation in the Old Testament, 2 vols. [Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Book House, 1990 repr., Eugene, Oreg.: Wipf and Stock, 1997], 2:930-31, emphasis in bold added)

 

Blog Archive