Saturday, June 11, 2022

Jeffrey S. Krohn's Desperate Attempt to Explain Away the Missing Books of the Bible

  

Concerning 1 Cor 5:9 and Paul’s comment of “I have written you in my letter”, most commentators simply believe that the letter referenced by Paul is lost (See Orr and Walther, 1 Corinthians, 120; Robertson and Plummer, Critical and Exegetical Commentary, 105). There is little doubt that some correspondence from the apostles has, indeed, been lost, and 1 Cor 5:9 holds no importance for the issue of canonicity, despite the assertions of LDS authors. Regarding Col 4;16 and “the letter from Laodicea,” Edward Lohse admits, “There is no trace of the Epistle to the Laodiceans” (Lohse, Colossians and Philemon, 175n48). David Pao writes that “most are convinced . . . that this letter remains lost” (Pao, Colossians and Philemon, 321). T. K. Abbott agrees that it could be a “lost Epistle,” although he remarks: “the Epistle referred to was one to which some importance was attached by St. Paul himself, so that he himself directs that it be read publicly in two distinct Churches” (Abbott, Epistles, 305, 306). Therefore, contra Lohse (“No stock can be put in considering Eph as that letter to the Laodiceans” [Lohse, Colossians and Philemon, 175n48]), he believes it to be the “Epistle to the Ephesians, which we know to have been written about the same time as the Epistle to the Colossians, and conveyed by the same messenger . . . [and] regarded as a circular letter” (Abbott, Epistles, 306). This would call into question the citation of Col 4:16 to argue for an incomplete canon. With these examples, LDS interpretations illustrate a neglect of the illocutionary intent of the author of individual biblical texts. This is done, apparently, on account of modern institutional motivation—casting doubt on the ancient canon will open the door to modern additional to Scripture. (Jeffrey S. Krohn, Mormon Hermeneutics: Five Approaches to the Bible by the LDS Church [Eugene, Oreg.: Pickwick Publications, 2022], 82-83)

 

Further Reading:


Lee Martin McDonald on the "Missing Books of the Bible" being Inspired Works


Protestant Apologist Phillip Kayser: There are Many Inspired/θεοπνευστος Books that are Not in the Bible


Not By Scripture Alone: A Latter-day Saint Refutation of Sola Scriptura

Blog Archive