Friday, October 14, 2022

Excerpts from The Sport of Life and Death: The Mesoamerican Ballgame (Thames and Hudson, 2001)

  

Olmec rulers offered their own blood as a sacrifice to feed and nourish the gods. . . . The symbolism and context of Olmec bloodletting offer a prototype for Maya blood sacrifice and beliefs. Among the Maya, offering blood was probably a symbolic reenactment of the sacrifices the gods made when they gave their own lives to create the world. As a result, blood sacrifice is both a symbol of death and a source of life throughout Mesoamerican history. (Douglas E. Bradley, “Gender, Power, and Fertility in the Olmec Ritual Ballgame,” in The Sport of Life and Death: The Mesoamerican Ballgame, ed. E. Michael Whittington [London: Thames and Hudson, 2001], 36)

 

The ballgame was one means by which human offerings of blood and death were accomplished. From the pre-Hispanic perspective, the taking of life was necessary in order to perpetuate life. The ballgame offered the defeated contender in war and conquest the opportunity of being sacrifice with honor. Such actions replicated the deeds of the Hero Twins who defeated death in the Quiché Maya epic the Popol Vuh. (María Teresa Uriarte, “Unity in Duality: The Practice and Symbols of the Mesoamerican Ballgame,” in The Sport of Life and Death: The Mesoamerican Ballgame, ed. E. Michael Whittington [London: Thames and Hudson, 2001], 44)

 

DEATH AND RESURRECTION

 

Death and resurrection are paramount themes of the Mesoamerican ballgame. It is the great drama of human sacrifice depicted on ballcourt reliefs and numerous portable objects that fuels our imagination. For Mesoamerican peoples, human sacrifice was a contractual agreement with the gods, in which the gift of creation was constantly repaid with blood—humanity’s most precious offering. The ballgame-playing Hero Twins of the Popol Vuh are  sacrificed and reborn, thus becoming the model for human interaction with the supernatural. (“Catalogue,” in The Sport of Life and Death: The Mesoamerican Ballgame, ed. E. Michael Whittington [London: Thames and Hudson, 2001], 250)

 

Blog Archive