Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464) on Matthew 16:18

  

. . . And when Christ said to Peter “Thou art Peter and upon this rock,” etc., we understand the word, rock, as a reference to Christ in him he [Peter] had confesses his belief. And if the word, rock [petram], is to be understood as a reference to Peter’s role as the foundation stone of the church, according to Jerome the other apostles were also foundation stones of the church. When these things are discussed in the next to the last book of the Apocalypse no one doubts that it refers to the apostles when it speaks of the twelve foundation stones of the city of Jerusalem. And if Christ said to Peter “Feed my sheep,” it is clear that this feeding is by word and example. Similarly according to St. Augustine’s gloss on the same passage, the same command was given to all [when Christ said] “Going into the whole world” in the last chapter of Matthew and Mark. Nothing else is said to Peter which implies any power. Therefore we are correct in saying that all the apostles are equal to Peter in power. (Nicholas of Cusa, The Catholic Concordance, Book II, paragraph 115 [trans. ed. Paul E. Sigmund; Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991], 90)

 

 

Indeed we say that all the apostles are equal in the grace of the apostolate just as in the grace of the priesthood all priests are equal, but we say that Peter was first among the apostles by virtue of a superabundance of grace. Augustine says in his last sermon [on the Gospel of] John, that because of abundant grace Peter was both the first apostle and on account of his primacy among the apostles also represented the church as a symbol of the whole. And the sacred writings describe the primacy with which Peter was endowed with a superabundance of grace by Christ, in the first chapter of John were Christ says, “Thou shalt be called Cephas,” which is interpreted Peter. Augustine in his seventh sermon comments on this passage as follows: “He made a great change when he changed Simon’s name to Peter. But Peter is now from rock [petra] and the rock is the church. Therefore the name of Peter symbolized the church.” Observe that according to the interpretation of the great and learned Augustine, the change in name was important. When Christ said, “Thou art Peter,” he used the present tense, where he had said earlier—in the future tense—“Thou shalt be called Cephas.” He did not say then, “Thou art named or called Peter” but “Thou art Peter.” From this it is evident that the promise of Christ that Simon would in the future be called Cephas was a promise of a real primacy. Hence when Augustine says that Peter had the primacy among the apostles he can not be interpreted as speaking of the time of his conversion or his recognition of the Messiah, as the name Peter is interpreted (according to Bede, incorrectly) to mean “the one who recognizes” by writers such as Alexander of Hales commenting on John. He adds on the same point that his brother, Andrew, who told him earlier that he had found the Messiah had already preceded him in that recognition, as we read in the first chapter of the Gospel of John. Therefore Augustine himself understands the primacy among the others in the church as necessarily referring to the rulership and eminence which Peter received after the college of the apostles had been created when Christ said, “Thou art Peter.” (Nicholas of Cusa, The Catholic Concordance, Book II, paragraph 251 [trans. ed. Paul E. Sigmund; Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991], 194-95)

 

Blog Archive