Thursday, June 12, 2025

Excerpts from Athanasius Schneider, Credo: Compendium of the Catholic Faith (2023)

The following are excerpts from Athanasius Schneider, Credo: Compendium of the Catholic Faith (Manchester, N.H.: Sophia Institute Press, 2023)

 

46. Can the Magisterium change the contents of this Deposit of Faith?

No, “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but My words shall never pass away” (Mt. 24:35). It is beyond the power of the Church to add to, subtract from, or alter the content of divine revelation, for she is charged strictly to teach “all those things whatsoever I have commanded you” (Mt 28:20).

 

47. What is the true meaning of the expression living Magisterium?

It means that the apostolic preaching, voiced through the Church’s Magisterium, will not cease until the end of the world. The voice of the apostles still lives and speaks when their successors, in an unbroken and faithful tradition, preserve and transmit the revealed truths; passing the living torch of the immutable doctrine of Faith, always eodem, dogmate, eodem sensu, eademque sententia—“the same dogma, in the same sense, and in the same meaning.”

 

48. What of a development of doctrine, subject to changing circumstances?

The expression “living tradition,” “living Magisterium,” “hermeneutic of continuity,” and “development of doctrine,” properly understood, can only mean that a greater clarity or precision is given to the same changeless content of divine revelation over time. Such new insights can never contradict what the Church has previously and definitively proposed, because Christ promised that the Holy Spirit would not reveal anything new, but only remind the disciples of what He told them (see Jn 14:26). (Athanasius Schneider, Credo: Compendium of the Catholic Faith [Manchester, N.H.: Sophia Institute Press, 2023], 7)

 

 

178. What were the immediate effects of this sin upon Adam and Eve?

Having become enemies of God, they were deprived of all grace and supernatural gifts, lost the right to enter heaven, and became subject to ignorance, concupiscence (the inclination to sin), suffering, and death. (Athanasius Schneider, Credo: Compendium of the Catholic Faith [Manchester, N.H.: Sophia Institute Press, 2023], 31)

 

 

257. Then what happens to infants who die with baptism?

Having committed no personal sin, it seems unfitting that unbaptized infants should suffer the fate of those who are damned. A widespread theological opinion holds that their exclusion from the Beatific Vision may not necessarily entail pain and suffering; but rather, infants dying without baptism could be admitted to a peaceful eternity of purely natural goods—a kind of indirect or mediate vision of God.

 

. . .

 

259. Would it be unjust to exclude unbaptized infants from the Beatific Vision?

No, because human nature has no right to the Beatific Vision. We may ask God to grant these children the miracle of sanctifying grace on account of His infinite mercy, but their destiny ultimately remains a mystery which we entrust to the loving providence of God. (Athanasius Schneider, Credo: Compendium of the Catholic Faith [Manchester, N.H.: Sophia Institute Press, 2023], 248, 249)

 

 

680. Have there been cases of popes promoting doctrinally ambiguous prayers in the liturgy of the Mass?

Yes. In 1969 Pope Paul VI approved a New Order of Mass with novel Offertory Prayers modeled after the Jewish Sabbath meal blessings (Berekoth). Because these prayers emphasize the aspect of a meal while seriously obscuring the propitiatory nature of the sacrifice, these Offertory Prayers are very close to a Protestant understanding of Holy Mass as a mere banquet.

 

681. Have there been cases of popes promoting doctrinally erroneous and morally problematic sacramental practices?

Yes. In 2016 Pope Francis approved the norms of the Buenos Aires bishops that granted Communion to unrepentant public adulterers: “When it is not possible to obtain a declaration of nullity, [living in continence] may not, in fact, be feasible. . . . If one arrives at the recognition that, in a particular case, there are limitations that diminish responsibility and culpability, particularly when a person judges that he would fall into a subsequent fault by damaging the children of the new union [by living in continence], Amoris Laetitia opens up the possibility of access to the sacraments of reconciliation and the Eucharist.” (Athanasius Schneider, Credo: Compendium of the Catholic Faith [Manchester, N.H.: Sophia Institute Press, 2023], 95)

 

In this, Pope Francis undermines the truth of the indissolubility of a valid and consummated marriage and, at the same time, the holiness of the two sacraments of the Eucharist and penance, which requires contrition and an intention not to sin against the divine commandments. Regarding the document of the Buenos Aires Bishops, Pope Francis maintained: “The document is very good and complexly explains the meaning of chapter VIII of Amoris Laetitia . There are no other interpretations. And I am certain that it will do much good” (Letter of September 5, 2016). In his later audience with the Cardinal Secretary of State, “Ex audientia SS.mi” (June 5, 2017), the pope declared this approval of the norms of the Bishops of the Buenos Aires region to be “authentic Magisterium.” (Ibid., 363 n. 74)

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Email for Logos.com Gift Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com

Blog Archive