Friday, September 26, 2025

Examples of a Triadic Formula ("wording") for Baptism in Early Christian Texts

  

Didache chapter 7:

 

1 Regarding baptism, baptize thus. After giving the foregoing instructions, ‘Baptize in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit’ in running water. 2 But if you have no running water, baptize in any other; and, if you cannot in cold water, then in warm. 3 But, if the one is lacking, pour the other three times on the head ‘in the name of the Father, and Son, and Holy Spirit.’ 4 But, before the baptism, let the one who baptizes and the one to be baptized fast, and any others who are able to do so. And you shall require the person being baptized to fast for one or two days.

 

Justin Martyr, First Apology 61:

 

. . . there is invoked over the one who wishes to be regenerated, and who is repentant of his sins, the name of God, the Father and Lord of all; he who leads the person to be baptized to the laver calls him by this name only.

 

Irenaeus, The Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching 3:

 

First of all it bids us bear in mind that we have received baptism for the remission of sins, in the name of God the Father, and in the name of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who was incarnate and died and rose again, and in the Holy Spirit of God. And that this baptism is the seal of eternal life, and is the new birth unto God, that we should no longer be the sons of mortal men, but of the eternal and perpetual God; . . .

 

Hippolytus, The Apostolic Tradition 21.11-18:

 

Then he should hand him over to the bishop or the presbyter who stands at the water to baptize; and they should stand in the water naked. And a deacon likewise should go down with him into the water. When the one being baptized goes down into the waters the one who baptizes, placing a hand on him, should say thus: “Do you believe in God the Father Almighty?” And he who is being baptized should reply: “I believe.” Let him baptize him once immediately, having his hand placed upon his head. And after this he should say: “Do you believe in Christ Jesus, the son of God, who was born of the Holy Spirit and Mary the virgin and was crucified under Pontius Pilate and was dead [and buried] and rose on the third day alive from the dead and ascended in the heavens and sits at the right hand of the Father and will come to judge the living and the dead?” And when he has said, “I believe,” he is baptized again. And again he should say: “Do you believe in the Holy Spirit and the holy church and the resurrection of the flesh?” And he who is being baptized should say: “I believe.” And so he should be baptized a third time.

 

 

Tertullian, Against Praxeas 26:

 

After His resurrection He promises in a pledge to His disciples that He will send them the promise of His Father; and lastly, He commands them to baptize into the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost, not into a unipersonal God. And indeed it is not once only, but three times, that we are immersed into the Three Persons, at each several mention of Their names.

 

Origen, Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, Book 5 chapter 7:

 

(11) Now do you wish to understand that it was not only by birth but also by instruction that death exercised its dominion from Adam? This can be learned from the contraries. For when the Lord Jesus Christ had come to amend what had been done wrongly, in view of the fact that the first birth, which came from Adam, was born to death, he introduces a second birth, which he called not so much being born as being reborn. Doubtless it was through this second birth that he wiped away the blemish of the first birth. And just as he substituted birth with re-birth, so also he replaced one doctrine with another. For when he sent his own disciples to do this task, he did not merely say, “Go, baptize all nations,” but, “Go, teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.” Therefore, because he knew that both were at fault, he gave a remedy for both, so that even our mortal birth would be changed by the re-birth of baptism, and the teaching of godliness might shut out the teaching of godlessness.

 

Origen, Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, Book 5 chapter 9:

 

(7) You may perhaps also be asking this: Since the Lord himself told the disciples to baptize all nations in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, why does the Apostle employ here the name of Christ alone in baptism? For he says, “We have been baptized into Christ,” although surely it should not be deemed a legitimate baptism unless it is in the name of the Trinity. But look at Paul’s good sense since, indeed, in the present passage he was not interested in discussing the subject of baptism as much as the death of Christ, in whose likeness he argues that we should die to sin and be buried with Christ. Obviously it was not appropriate to name either the Father or the Holy Spirit in a passage in which he was speaking about death. [M1040] For “the Word became flesh”; and where there is flesh, it is fitting to treat the subject of death. But it was not fitting for him to say, “We who have been baptized in the name of the Father or in the name of the Holy Spirit, have been baptized into his death.” Consequently, in this passage one should keep in mind the Apostle’s custom in other places, that when he cites the Scriptures, he does not always cite the complete wording of the text as it is found in the original passage, but he takes only as much as is called for by his current argument. Thus in the expression we have mentioned here, because he desired to teach about the death of Christ, it is sufficient for him to say, “We who have been baptized into Christ were baptized into his death.”

 

Origen, Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, Book 8:

 

(8) But let us now see what are the good things that they preach, i.e., that they announce. Although what he says, evangelizare, may be translated “to announce good things,” we need to endeavor to ascertain what the good things are that he has added to this good. The one true good is God, whose image of goodness is the Son and his Spirit, who is called good. Therefore, he has designated as “good things” that one good, since it consists in God, the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit. For this is what evangelists announce, according to the command of our Lord and Savior, who said, “Go, teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” These, then, are the good things of those who preach the gospel.

 

Cyprian of Carthage, Letters 73:

 

5.2 When the Lord was sending forth His disciples after His resurrection, He taught them how they were to baptize, instructing them with these words: All power is given me in heaven and on earth. Go, therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. There He makes known to them the Trinity in Whose sacred name the nations were to be baptized. But surely Marcion does not hold this Trinity? Surely he does not confess the same God the Father and Creator as we do? Does he recognize the same Christ His Son, born of the Virgin Mary, the Word which was made flesh, who bore our sins, who by dying overcame death, who initiated the resurrection of the flesh, beginning with His own person, and who revealed to His disciples that He had risen again in the same flesh?

 

. . .

 

17.2 Moreover, the case of the Jews in the time of the apostles was altogether different from the situation of the Gentiles. The former had already received the most ancient baptism of the Law and of Moses; they needed, therefore, to be baptized, in addition, in the name of Jesus Christ. We can see this in the Acts of the Apostles, in the words Peter addressed to them: Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ the Lord for the forgiveness of sins, and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For to you is the promise, and to your children and to all who come thereafter, whomsoever the Lord has called. Here Peter mentions Jesus Christ, not that the Father should be omitted but so that to the Father should be added the Son. 18.1 On the other hand, after the resurrection, when the Lord was sending the apostles to the Gentiles, He bade that they should baptize them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. How, then, do some people claim that a Gentile can obtain forgiveness of sins if he is baptized outside and beyond the Church, even in opposition to the Church, no matter where nor how, so long as it is in the name of Jesus Christ? Whereas it is Christ Himself who bids that the Gentiles are to be baptized in the full and united Trinity.

 

Eusebius of Caesarea, Letter to the People of His Diocese 3:

 

5. “And we believe also in one Holy Spirit. We believe each of these to be and to exist, the Father truly Father, and the Son truly Son, and the Holy Spirit truly Holy Spirit, as also our Lord said when he sent forth his disciples to preach, ‘Go teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit’ [Matt. 28:19]. Concerning which things we also confidently affirm that this is what we maintain, how we think, and what we have held up until now, and that we will maintain this faith unto death, anathematizing every ungodly heresy.

 

Blog Archive