Tuesday, September 16, 2025

M. David Litwa on John 10:30

  

“I and the Father are One”

 

At the height of his speech, Jesus sublimely announces: “I and the Father are one” (John 10:30). Again, stones are seized, as the Jews instantly recognize a self- deifying claim. Many commentators are quick to point out that, in context, Jesus does not say that he is ontologically one with God. Jesus and God share a divine prerogative (the eternal protection of the elect). Thus the unity that Jesus speaks of is a functional one. It is doubtful, however, whether the Jews— or John’s original readers— were aware of the distinction between functional and ontological unity. If they were, it is unclear how much weight it would have had. Yet whether Jesus claimed ontological or functional oneness with God, he still claimed (in some fashion) to be God.

 

The irony of the situation is that Jesus claims to be God in the very temple that Antiochus Epiphanes was thought to deify himself— on the very holiday when the Jews celebrated his overthrow. Jesus’s rhetorical attempt to make himself God thus replays the archetypal sin of the Greek king— with a strikingly different outcome.

 

With rocks aimed at him, Jesus is in evident danger. This time, he holds his ground, and asks a (frankly, loaded) question: “Many excellent works I showed you from the Father. For which of these works do you stone me?” (John 10:32). The question assumes that the Jews thought that Jesus’s works were excellent. They did not.

 

To his opponents, Jesus’s question seems ludicrous because his works, done on the Sabbath, involved flagrant disobedience to God. The Jews set the record straight: “We do not stone you for a work of excellence, but for blasphemy; because you, a human being, make yourself a god (poieis seauton theon)” (John 10:33). Whatever good works Jesus had accomplished, he was still a rebel against God. Any human who proclaimed himself to be a god (or God) was liable to execution, regardless of what miracles he had performed.

 

To defuse the threat, Jesus deploys an argument the reader now finds familiar. He denies that he deifies himself on the grounds that Yahweh sanctified and sent him. Yet if Jesus and Yahweh are truly “one” (as Jesus claimed), the distinction between sender and sent is fragile. Moreover, Jesus will later say in prayer to God that it was Jesus himself who sanctified himself (John 17:19). (M. David Litwa, Desiring Divinity: Self-deification in Early Jewish and Christian Mythmaking [Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016], 84-85)

 

 

Blog Archive