Monday, November 24, 2025

Account of Cannibalism Among Nohaa ("great water") Indians in the Usumacinta Region

  

All the indications point to a comparatively late penetration of the Maya into the region southwest of the Usumacinta. Nevertheless some of them had established themselves there prior to the fifth decade of the seventeenth century. About this time authorization to pacify the pagan Indians of Manche and Lacandon was given to a certain Diego de Vera Ordóñez de Villaquirán, who named the region El Próspero. Although he did little to carry out this ambitious scheme, he succeeded in subjecting a settlement of Indians called Nohaa (“great water”) on a lake. A Dominican friar from Chiapas made little progress in Christianizing the people, since they spoke only Yucatecan Maya, but subsequently Franciscan missionaries came from Yucatan and lived among them for a time. Nohaa is described as being 15 or 18 leagues from Tenosique on the other side of the river. Later the Barrios expedition to Dolores came to a deserted site called Próspero 12 leagues east of Ocosingo. We are told that it was so named because formerly Villaquirán had established his headquarters there. Nohaa, however was evidently farther to the east, since the accounts of the Barrios expedition do not mention a lake, and Cogolludo tells us that the town was more accessible from the Usamacinta valley than from Chiaspas.

 

The missionaries reported that the people of Nohaa were monogamous. From what little we know of their religious organization, it somewhat resembled that of the Maya (Yucatecan Maya). A priest had charge of their idols. He was assisted in his ceremonies by an ah kulel, or deputy, and an ah kayom, which means singer or chanter. A daughter of one of these men prepared the sacred breadstuffs, and no other woman was present at the sacrifices. Human sacrifice was practiced, accompanied by excision of the heart and ceremonial cannibalism. The victims were only foreigners and not their own people, so we infer that they sometimes made war on their neighbors. In cases of adultery the priest acted as judge and took part in the execution of convicted persons. We know nothing of the function of the chief. (France V. Scholes and Ralph L. Roys, The Maya Chontal Indians of Acalan Tixchel: A Contribution to the History and Ethnography of the Yucatan Peninsula [Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication no. 560; Washington, D. C.: Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1948], 45-46)

 

Blog Archive