Thursday, February 27, 2025

The Use of "I Am" (εγω ειμι) in John 18:5-6

  

The use of the words ‘I am’ in Jn 18:5–6 and 8 clearly show that, while ἐγώ εἰμι is used as a simple identification formula, the two words may simultaneously have a deeper meaning. The reason that the soldiers fall down when Jesus utters the words ἐγώ εἰμι is not stated. It is assumed that the reader will know. While accepting the fact that Jesus identifies himself to the soldiers with these words, the reader must look for something that would explain their strange reaction. Bultmann posits a miracle to account for the reaction and there may be some truth in that, but more needs to be said. I believe Ball is right to see the words here acting as a trigger to point to the other occurrences of the term in the Gospel to explain Jesus’ words. The threefold repetition of ἐγώ εἰμι in 18:5, 6, 8 emphasizes the importance of the expression. That this saying occurs at the moment of betrayal particularly points back to 13:19, where the fulfilment of Scripture and Jesus’ own words were linked to the betrayal in order that the disciples might believe ‘that I am’. Thus a simple recognition formula in which Jesus states that he is the person whom the soldiers seek is given a double meaning by the reaction of those same soldiers to his words as well as by the previous use of ἐγώ εἰμι in the Gospel. Although it is correct to talk of Jesus’ identity in terms of Jesus of Nazareth on one level, on another there is something that cannot be explained without probing the possible background and powerful impact of the words ἐγώ εἰμι. John can take simple words and, by the way they are formulated (8:24, 28; 13:19) as well as by the reactions to them (8:58; 18:5, 6, 8), indicate that something profound is signified in relation to Jesus’ identity. It is to the significance of ἐγώ εἰμι in the lxx (especially of Deutero-Isaiah) that I turn now, and, having looked at the significance of the expression, I will then assess Deutero-Isaiah as a possible background for the unpredicated ‘I am’ sayings in John. The goal of this investigation is to endeavour to demonstrate that the name the Father has given to Jesus is the holy name of Yhwh, the name borne on the turban of the high priest and the name in which Jesus ‘keeps’ his disciples. (Alan Kerr, The Temple of Jesus’ Body: The Temple Theme in the Gospel of John [Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 220; New York: Sheffield Academic Press, 2002], 326-28)

 

 

The polyvalent force of egō eimi finds its most dramatic demonstration in the account of Jesus’ arrest, where the soldiers’ response of drawing back and falling to the ground (Jn 18:6) demonstrates Jesus’ sovereign control over the events leading to his death. Indeed, Jesus’ twofold pronouncement of egō eimi in this scene serves as a powerful exemplification of the claims linked to this elusive expression elsewhere in John, for it encapsulates the Johannine presentation of Jesus as the one in whom God is revealed and his promises are fulfilled.(C. H. Williams, “I Am Sayings,” in Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels, ed. Joel B. Green, Jeannine K. Brown, and Nicholas Perrin [Downers Grove, Ill.: IVP Academic, 2013], 399)

 

While the phrase may at places constitute a simple self-reference (“It is I,” or, in more mundane terms, “It’s me”), there are places where references to Jesus in terms of “I am” in John’s Gospel almost certainly convey the notion of deity. One such place is Jesus’ statement to the Jews in 8:58, “I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.” The Jews’ reaction—they pick up stones to kill Jesus—makes clear that they took Jesus’ pronouncement as involving a claim to deity. Another likely instance is 18:5–6, where Jesus identifies himself to those who would arrest him as “I am he,” at which the soldiers drew back and fell to the ground. In this case, egō eimi may constitute a self-reference on a literal level and at the same time involve a claim to deity on a secondary, deeper level, as is suggested by the soldiers’ response, which is a customary reaction to divine revelation or theophany. (See, e.g., Ezek. 1:28; 44:4; Dan. 2:46; 8:18; 10:9; Acts 9:4; 22:7; 26:14; Rev. 1:17; 19:10; 22:8) (Andreas J. Köstenberger, “The Deity of Christ in John’s Gospel,” in The Deity of Christ, ed. Christopher W. Morgan and Robert A. Peterson [Theology in Community; Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway, 2011], 106)

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Email for Logos.com Gift Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com

Blog Archive