Monday, November 10, 2025

Artur Weister on Psalm 16:9-10

  

[9] Being assured of his lifelong communion with God, the psalmist’s heart is filled with gladness and he breaks forth into rejoicing. He knows that in the future he will be safe in God’s arms, and that this is true both of his body and his soul. In this connection attention must be drawn to the fact that he gives expression to that optimistic conviction, based on faith, at the very moment when his thoughts turn to the contemplation of death! [10] Indeed, it is precisely what he feels bound to say as he faces the thought of death—which does not frighten him, but on the contrary gives him confidence (cf. the connecting word ‘for’). Opinions are divided as to the concrete meaning of the statement made in v. 10. The great majority of more recent expositors hold the view that what the author has in mind is that God will protect him from a sudden, untimely, or evil death. However, neither the wording of the verse nor the general circumstances and attitude of the poet suggest such an interpretation; moreover, it is precisely the decisive feature of that interpretation—the specific kind of death—which is read into the text. There is no reason to doubt that the poet, speaking of death in quite general terms, has in mind death as such, that is, death in general, and that by virtue of his faith in God he is progressing towards the conquest of the fear of death in his heart. How he actually conceives of the particular circumstances of that process cannot be clearly deduced from his statement. If the second half of the verse is translated as an exact parallel to the first half, as has been done here, we might be able to think that the psalmist will be taken up by God into heaven (cf. Gen. 5:24; 2 Kings 2:1 ff.). If the word which in accordance with its usual meaning we have rendered ‘pit’, is derived from the Hebrew root of the word ‘decay’ (= rot), then it may be possible to infer from that reading that the psalmist is here thinking of the resurrection from the dead. Such an interpretation—and it is not impossible—would be in keeping with the Greek translation and with the New Testament, where the verse has been interpreted as referring to the resurrection of Jesus (Acts 2:25 ff.; 13:35). It seems to me, however, that in attempting to interpret the psalmist’s statement the question of how he conceives of his being spared death has been given undue prominence by the very manner in which that question has been formulated; and this view is supported by the true meaning of the psalm itself. The poet, at any rate—probably deliberately—does not particularly emphasize that question. Presumably he refrains from doing so in the first place because, standing as he does in the front line of those who are opposed to the religious practices of their time, he does not want to expose himself to being accused of paganism by adopting the belief in the resurrection from the dead, which after all was encouraged in the worship of the vegetation gods (cf. the cultic myth of Baal and Mot in the Ras Shamra texts and Hos. 6:1 ff.); and secondly, and this is what matters most, because, on the basis of his faith in God, the ‘that’ is of greater importance to him than the ‘how’ (cf. also the comments on v. 11). True, the author wants to express the fact that his belief in the overcoming of death is equal to that of others. But the source from which he derives his belief is a different one. It is the same source which has become manifest throughout the psalm as the foundation of the psalmist’s faithful optimism—a life lived in communion with God. Where such a life in communion with God involves the whole man, there death for all practical purposes loses that dreadful importance which it has for those people whose sense of life is rather naïve. The problem of death here gives way, not to an excessive craving for the enjoyment of life to the full in the natural sense, but to the abundance of life lived on a higher level which flows from communion with God. By reaching a deeper religious insight into the meaning of life, the worshipper, in fact, considers the problem of death as no longer the most crucial question. This is the course which the psalmist adopts to overcome death. To the life-giving power of God in which the poet is privileged to share, death and the underworld are no insurmountable obstacles which could shatter that living communion with God. Living in utter dependence on God as he does, the psalmist possesses the victorious power that is able to overcome death. In the light of this interpretation we come to understand the sense in which the verse in question has been used in the New Testament. There can be no doubt that v. 10 is not meant to be understood as a prophetic prediction of the resurrection of Jesus, but the New Testament teaching of the resurrection from the dead and the thoughts which here occupy the mind of the psalmist are based on the same fundamental conviction, namely, an unshakable belief in the life-giving power of God (which in the resurrection of Christ has definitely conquered death). (Artur Weister, The Psalms: A Commentary [The Old Testament Library; Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1988], 176-78)

 

Blog Archive