Saturday, December 27, 2025

Roy Neal Runyon on Mark 16:16 and the Necessity of Water Baptism

Roy Neal Runyon, while a critic of baptismal regeneration, teaches that baptism is a commandment and is necessary for salvation. In response to a sneaky apologetic to explain Mark 16:16, responded thusly:

 

Mark 16:16 Doesn’t Say, ‘He Who Is Not Baptized Will Be Condemned’

 

This objection, though often repeated lacks both logical and grammatical merit. Mark 16:16 does not need to say, “He who does not believe and is not baptized will be condemned,” because belief is the prerequisite to baptism. One who does not believe will not be baptized, making the second clause redundant. To demand that “and is not baptized” be added to the condemnation clause is to insist on the grammatical excess where the logic is already complete. In fact, Jesus explicitly stated in John 3:18 that “he who does not believe is condemned. It is a dangerous misuse of Scripture to argue that the presence of baptism in the salvation clause can be undone by its absence in the condemnation clause. How can what the text does not say negate what it explicitly does say? The omission does not weaken the first statement—it presupposes it.

 

Scripture often uses this kind of parallel structure without restating all conditions in the negative clause. For example, John 5:28-29 says, “Those who have done good will come forth to the resurrection of life; those who have done evil, to the resurrection of condemnation.” It doesn’t say “those who have not done good,” yet the inverse is understood. The same is true in Proverbs 18:13: “He who answers a matter before he hears it, it is folly and shame to him”—it doesn’t need to say “he who does not answer after hearing” to make the opposite truth clear. More importantly, Scripture makes clear that refusing baptism is a form of unbelief—a willful rejection of God’s command. Luke 7:30 states of the Pharisees, “But the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the counsel of God against themselves, being not baptized of [John].” This shows that rejecting baptism is not a neutral act—it is a rejection of God’s revealed will. Likewise, John 12:42 records that many of the rulers believed on Jesus, but because of fear they would not confess Him publicly. Their belief was rendered powerless by their unwillingness to act on it. Jesus said, “He who denies Me before men will be denied before the angels of God” (Luke 12:9). Baptism is the very moment one confesses Christ openly (Acts 8:37), and to shrink back from it is to deny Him in the very act where one is commanded to submit to Him. (Roy Neal Runyon, Misunderstood Conversions of the New Testament [2025], 188-89)

 

Blog Archive