Saturday, December 13, 2025

Oecumenius on Revelation 11 and the then-future coming of Elijah

  

11. Everything in the vision was shaped by the evangelist in connection with the design of the Lord in his incarnation—his birth, his temptation, his teachings, the insults to him, and indeed the cross and the resurrection, and the second coming, and in addition to these the rewards and punishments of the saints and the sinners. But nothing had been said about the accounts of the heralds of his second coming, so, as though by a turnabout, these matters are now explained. (2) It is clear to everyone that the divine Scripture predicted that Elijah the Tishbite would come, because Malachi says, “See, I will send you Elijah the Tishbite before the great and glorious day of the Lord comes, who will turn the heart of the father to his son, and the heart of a man to his neighbor, lest I come and smite the land with might.” And in Matthew’s gospel the Lord says of the Baptist, “and if you are willing to accept it, he is Elijah who is to come.” (3) We have not heard anything at all clear about any other herald, except that Genesis said about Enoch, “because he was well-pleasing to God he was taken up,” and the wise apostle said about him, “By faith Enoch was taken up so that he should not see death; and he was not found, because God had taken him.” (4) An old tradition holds sway in the church: with Elijah the Tishbite, Enoch will also come as the precursor of the second coming of Christ, as he prepares to take his stand against the Antichrist; for they say that they came first and testified that the signs which the Antichrist would perform were deception and that one should not believe the wretch. (5) It is about these that the vision now says that they will prophesy for so many days, meaning either some mystical number or one which will actually be the truth. (6) They will do this, he says, clothed in sackcloth. For they will mourn over the disobedience of humankind at that time. (Oecumenius, Commentary on the Apocalypse [trans. John N. Suggit; The Fathers of the Church 112; Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2006], 101-2)

 

Blog Archive