Sunday, May 10, 2026

Dylan Schrader's Lame Attempt to Support the Dogmas of the Immaculate Conception and Bodily Assumption

Overall, Dylan Schrader, Mary, Mother of God’s Word Made Flesh (2026) is a good book for those curious about Roman Catholic Mariology. There is even a good discussion of the Debitum Peccati, which is often overlooked in Mariological treatises today. However, as with many Roman Catholics, his defense of Marian dogmas as being apostolic in origin is a stretch. Consider the following (and note, according to Rome, the substance of these dogmas were part of the deposit of faith that stopped being added to at the end of the first century, and if you knowingly reject any, you are guilty of mortal sin):

 

On the Immaculate Conception:

 

The development of the dogma of the immaculate conception owes a great deal to the Church’s piety, particularly the liturgical feast of Mary’s conception, as Pius IX makes clear in Ineffabilis Deus. But the Church’s acceptance of such piety is itself an argument for the apostolic character of the doctrine. If the Church had recognized the veneration of Mary immaculate as foreign to her faith, the widespread embrace of such piety would have been impossible. (Dylan Schrader, Mary, Mother of God’s Word Made Flesh [Sacra Doctrina; Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2026], 71-72)

 

On the Bodily Assumption:

 

The apostolic Church’s silence—at least in terms of what has survived to the present day—on the matter also does not count against the assumption. In fact, this silence is really an attestation to the assumption. No one boasted of having the relics of Mary’s body, a fact that points to their unavailability. Nor does the early Church lament a lack of relics as if Mary’s bones had been lost, destroyed, or stolen. (Dylan Schrader, Mary, Mother of God’s Word Made Flesh [Sacra Doctrina; Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2026], 219)

 

Blog Archive