Friday, February 13, 2026

Richard Bruce Cox on the Use of the Apocrypha by Josephus

  

Josephus was familiar with the Apocrypha and used some of them in his research, but he did not consider them to be inspired Scripture because they were not written by prophets, with the prophetic succession failing after Artaxerxes I of Persia (464-423 B.C.). (Richard Bruce Cox, Jr., “The Nineteenth Century British Apocrypha Controversy” [Baylor University, May 1981], 72)

 

 

In the Jewish Antiquities, I Esdras was used instead of the canonical Ezra-Nehemiah (e.g. XI. iii. 2-8 [Grk. XI. 33-63]=1 Esd. 3-4) and some of the Additions to Esther were utilized (XI. vi. 6 [Grk. XI. 216-19]=Add. Est. "B," 13:1-7; XI. vi. 8-9 [Grk. XI. 229-41]=Add. Est. "C," 13:8-14:19, and "D," 15:1-16; XI. vi. 12 /Grk. XI. 273-83/=Add. Est. "E," 16:1-24); Swete, Old Testament in Greek, p. 378. First Maccabees was the principal source for its historical period (Jewish Antiquities XII-XIII); Albright and Freedman, AB vol. 41 (1976): I Maccabees, by Jonathan A. Goldstein, pp. 14, 56. (Ibid., 72 n. 2)

 

Blog Archive