To see how desperate Calvinists and other proponents of some form of eternal security are, see the following from Beeke and Smalley vis-à-vis Heb 10:26-29:
In the warning of Hebrews 10:29, it is not clear that the
phrase “the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified” (ESV) indicates that
the apostate was once saved by Christ. First, it is possible to translated “he
was sanctified” was “one who was sanctified,” meaning that it does not refer to
the person rejecting Christ, but to a general principle of salvation by Christ’s
blood that the apostate rejects. Second, the person “sanctified” by the blood
may be the apostate, but his sanctification could refer to outward consecration
as a professing member of the “saints” (6:10; 13:24), not inward
sanctification. Third, it may be that “he was sanctified” refers to “the Son of
God” (10:29). It could refer to Christ’s consecration as a priest, for priests
were consecrated with blood (Ex. 29:29-21). Or it could refer to Christ’s consecration
as the true and living sanctuary that unbelievers “trampled underfoot” just as
the Gentiles did to the blood-consecrated sanctuary. In any of these
interpretations, it is not a person redeemed by Christ’s blood who falls away,
and so the text is consistent with the efficacy of his sacrifice.
It is highly unlikely that Hebrews 10:29 indicates that
Christ’s blood consecrates some who will perish, for earlier in the same
chapter we read that Christ accomplished the work to fulfill the promises of complete
salvation: “For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are
sanctified. Whereof the Holy Ghost also a witness to us: for after that he had
said before, This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days,
saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I
write them; and their sins and iniquities will I remember no more” (10:14-17,
citing Jer. 31:33-34). Christ’s sacrifice secures all grace for his people,
including the sovereign grace that achieves their inward transformation so that
they meet the conditions of the covenant and, unlike many in old covenant
Israel, will not be rejected as covenant breakers. (Joel R. Beeke and Paul M.
Smalley, Reformed Systematic Theology, 4 vols. [Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway,
2020], 2:1068-69)
To see why Beeke and Smalley
are wrong (e.g., in their claim that the one sanctified in v. 29 could be
Jesus) and that vv. 10-14 supports Reformed theology, see:
Refuting Tony Brown on the theology of the Epistle to the Hebrews
To Support this Blog:
Email for Amazon Gift
card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com
Email for Logos.com Gift
Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com
