Wednesday, May 27, 2026

Excerpts from Andrei A. Orlov, “The Veneration Motif in the Temptation Narrative of the Gospel of Matthew” (2016)

  

Satan’s request for veneration also can be a part of the evangelists’ Adam Christology: Satan, who lost his celestial status by refusing to venerate the first Adam, is now attempting to reverse the situation by asking the last Adam to bow down.

 

Although the tradition of Satan’s request for worship is also found in Luke, Matthew appears to reinforce this veneration theme further by adding the peculiar terminology of prostration and by concluding his temptation story with the appearance of servicing angels. It is possible that these embellishments are intended to affirm the traditions of devotion to and exaltation of the last Adam that are constructed both negatively and positively by invoking the memory of the first Adam’s veneration.

 

Scholars have noted wide usage of the formulae of worship and veneration in the Gospel of Matthew that appears to be more consistent than in the other Synoptic Gospels. In view of this tendency, the Adamic tradition of veneration of humanity might also be perceived in other parts of Matthew, including the magi story narrated earlier in the gospel. It is noteworthy that both the temptation and the magi narratives contain identical terminology of worship. First, in the magi story one can see repeated usage of the verb προσκυνέω (cf. Matt 2:2, 8, 11), which is also prominent in the temptation story (Matt 4:9, 10). In both accounts this terminology appears to have a cultic significance. Also, both in the magi story and in the third Matthean temptation of Jesus, one can find a distinctive juxtaposition of the expression “falling down” (πεσόντες/πεσών) with the formulae of worship (προσεκύνησαν/προσκυνήσῃς). (Andrei A. Orlov, “The Veneration Motif in the Temptation Narrative of the Gospel of Matthew: Lessons from the Enochic Tradition,” in Enoch and the Synoptic Gospels: Reminiscences, Allusions, Intertextuality, ed. Loren T. Stuckenbruck and Gabriele Boaccaccini [Early Judaism and its Literature 44; Atlanta: SBL Press, 2016], 343-44)

 

 

The suggestion that the veneration motif found in the temptation story might be connected to the theme of worship of Jesus in Matthew is hinted by the usage of the verb προσκυνέω. Larry Hurtado (How on Earth Did Jesus Become a God? Historical Questions about Earliest Devotion to Jesus [Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2005], 143) suggests that the “pattern of preference for προσκυνέω, with its strong associations with cultic worship, suggests that Matthew has chosen to make these scenes all function as foreshadowings of the exalted reverence of Jesus familiar to his Christian readers in their collective worship.… The net effect of Matthew’s numerous omissions and insertions of προσκυνέω in cases where Jesus is the recipient of homage is a consistent pattern. It is not simply a matter of preference of one somewhat synonymous word for others. Matthew reserves the word προσκυνέω for the reverence of Jesus given by disciples and those who are presented as sincerely intending to give him homage. As Günther Bornkamm, Gerhard Barth, and Heinz Joachim Held concluded from their analysis of scenes where Jesus is the recipient of the gesture in Matthew, προσκυνέω is used ‘only in the sense of genuine worship of Jesus.’” (Ibid., 343-44 n. 21)

 

 

 

The story of the magi speaks of mysterious visitors from the East who came to pay homage to the newborn king of the Jews. Some details of the account suggest that one might have here not simply the story of veneration by foreign guests, but possibly the theme of angelic reverence. Some scholars have pointed to the angelological details of the narrative. For  example, it has been observed that the mysterious star, which assists the magi in their journey to the Messiah, appears to be an angel, more specifically a guiding angel whose function is to lead the foreign visitors to Jesus. Other features of the story are also intriguing, as they, like the details of the temptation narrative, seem to betray some traces of apocalyptic traditions. It is also possible that, here, as in the temptation story, one can see a cluster of Adamic motifs. The baby Jesus, for instance, might be depicted as an eschatological counterpart of the first human, and, just as in the creation of the protoplast, which in the Primary Adam Books is marked by angelic veneration, the entrance of the last Adam into the world is also celebrated by a similar ritual of obeisance.

 

Let us now explore more closely other possible Adamic allusions in the story of the magi. First, the origin of the magi from the East (ἀπὸ ἀνατολῶν) might show a possible connection with Eden, a garden that according to biblical testimonies was planted in the East. Gifts of the magi, including frankincense and myrrh, which were traditionally used in antiquity as ingredients of incense, bring to mind Adam’s sacrifices, which according to Jewish extrabiblical lore, the protoplast was offering in the garden of Eden in fulfillment of his sacerdotal duties. Such sacrifices are mentioned in Jub. 3:27, a passage depicting Adam as a protological high priest who burns incense in paradise. In view of the possible cultic flavor of the magi story, Jesus might be understood there not simply as the last Adam but as a priestly eschatological Adam in a fashion reminiscent of the book of Jubilees. In the context of these traditions, the magi could be understood as visitors, possibly even angelic visitors, from the garden of Eden, once planted in the East, who are bringing to a new priest the sacerdotal tools used in the distant past by Adam. This exegetical connection is not implausible given that some later Christian materials, including Cave of Treasures, often associate the gifts of the magi with Adam’s sacrifices

 

Moreover, it appears that other details of the magi narrative, including the peculiar juxtaposition of its antagonistic figure with the theme of worship, again bring to mind the protoplast story reflected in various versions of the Primary Adam Books, with its motifs of angelic veneration and Satan’s refusal to worship the first human. Recall that Matthew connects the main antagonist of the magi story, Herod, with the theme of veneration by telling that the evil king promised to worship the messianic child.

 

The magi narrative demonstrates that the veneration motifs play an important role in the overarching theological framework of Matthew’s Gospel. The cultic significance of the veneration motif can be further illustrated in Matthew’s transfiguration story in chapter 17. There, at the end of Jesus’s transfiguration on the mountain, the already familiar veneration motif is evoked again when the disciples, overwhelmed with the vision, throw themselves down with their faces to the ground. It is noteworthy that this depiction of the disciples’ prostration at Jesus’s transfiguration is strikingly absent from both Mark and Luke. In Matthew this motif seems to fit nicely in the chain of previous veneration occurrences, thus evoking the memory of both the falling down of the magi and Satan’s quest for prostration—traditions likewise absent from other Synoptic accounts. (Andrei A. Orlov, “The Veneration Motif in the Temptation Narrative of the Gospel of Matthew: Lessons from the Enochic Tradition,” in Enoch and the Synoptic Gospels: Reminiscences, Allusions, Intertextuality, ed. Loren T. Stuckenbruck and Gabriele Boaccaccini [Early Judaism and its Literature 44; Atlanta: SBL Press, 2016], 344-48)

 

Blog Archive