Tuesday, May 26, 2026

Leslie Baynes on the Relationship Between Luke 16:19-31 and Si-Osiris

The following comes from:

 

Leslie Baynes, “The Parables of Enoch and Luke’s Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus,” in Enoch and the Synoptic Gospels: Reminiscences, Allusions, Intertextuality, ed. Loren T. Stuckenbruck and Gabriele Boaccaccini (Early Judaism and its Literature 44; Atlanta: SBL Press, 2016), 148-50

 

Luke 16:19-31

Si-Orisis

There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and linen and who made merry during his life.

A rich man receives a splendid burial shrouded in fine linen.

And at his gate lay a poor man by the name of Lazarus, covered with sores and longing to satisfy his hunger with what fell from the rich man’s table; And even the dogs would come and lick his sores.

There is no connection between the rich

man and the poor one.

The poor man died and was borne away by the angels to the bosom of Abraham. The rich man also died and was buried.

A poor man is buried ignominiously

but receives a place of honor in the

underworld (Amenti), with the ruler of

the underworld, Osiris.

In Hades, where he was being tormented, he lifted his eyes and saw Abraham far away with Lazarus in his bosom.

The rich man is tormented in the underworld.

 

The rich man’s torment is a door hinge through his eye. He does not see the poor man in Amenti, and vice versa; they are both observed by third parties, Si-Osiris and his father.

He called out, “Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue; for I am in agony in this flame.”

The rich man never begs for mercy. He does not suffer flames.

But Abraham said, “Child, remember that during your lifetime you received your good things, and Lazarus in like manner evil things; but now he is comforted here, and you are in agony.

 

Besides all this, between you and us a great chasm has been fixed, so that those who might want to pass from here to you cannot do so, and no one can cross from there to us.”

The moral of the story: good deeds must outweigh bad in order to enjoy peace in the afterlife.*

He said, “Then, father, I beg you to send him to my father’s house—for I have five brothers—that he may warn them, so that they will not also come into this place of torment.” Abraham replied, “They have Moses and the prophets; they should listen to them.” He said, “No, father Abraham; but if someone goes to them from the dead, they will repent.” He said to him, “If they do not listen to Moses and the prophets, neither will they be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.”

Si-Osiris has returned from the dead, but in a manner completely unrelated to any request from the tormented rich man.

 

Si-Osiris’s father takes to heart the negative example he observed in Amenti.

 

All of the stories we have considered here give different rationales for the rich man/men suffering in the afterlife, a detail Luke does not explicitly articulate. Much ink has been spilled trying to explain the reason for Dives’s torment, but I agree with Bauckham that it is clear, like it or not: the rich man received good in his life, and Lazarus did not. I go beyond Bauckham (“Rich Man and Lazarus,” 232–33) in using internal context clues to infer that Dives’s earthly treatment of Lazarus was callous—literally damning—indifference to him. We do not know if Dives built his wealth unjustly on the backs of the poor, as the rich in the Parables and Epistle of Enoch did. Active oppression of the poor is one important reason for the rich suffering the flame of Sheol in both those books, while the Parables also emphasizes arrogant refusal to acknowledge God and his Chosen One.

 

As the chart demonstrates, the story of Si-Osiris is not a perfect match with Luke 16:19–31. But while it is always possible that Luke did not know this story, either in a written or an oral form, and used instead texts based on it that are no longer extant, or related ideas “in the air” of a common milieu, I believe the text we have at hand precludes the necessity to peer into the void speculating about (currently) nonexistent alternatives. Hence in addition to the Epistle and the Parables of Enoch, I think it is likely that Luke was influenced by the story of Si-Osiris as well.


Blog Archive