Saturday, February 22, 2025

Example of how an Interpreter Who Rejects Baptismal Regeneration Approaches 1 Peter 3:21

  

Both Heb. 10.22-23 and 1 Pet. 3.21 do in fact refer to water baptism. The Hebrews passage refers to both water baptism and internal spiritual cleaning. The author is concerned with the cleansing of the guilty conscience, but he does not say that the water ritual could effect such a change, rather he distinguishes the two things by the conjunction “and.” We need to bear in mind, however, that for adult converts coming into the New Covenant community from outside, the water ritual may indeed come close on the heels of the cleansing of the heart, and in any case, the latter is aptly symbolized by the former. Conversion is one thing, however, ritual initiation is another, as is shown in Acts, where we find both the pattern water then Spirit reception (Acts 8), and Spirit reception then water (Acts 10), then distinction between John’s and Christian baptism in Acts 18-19. Baptism most obviously symbolizes spiritual cleansing (Heb. 10.23; Acts 22.16; and see the language in Eph. 5.26-27). But it is a striking fact that the most dominant image that comes to the minds of the NT writers when they thin about baptism is death, and not just any sort of death, but death as a judgment of God, and that brings us to 1 Pet. 3.21.

 

In some ways, 1 Pet. 3 is the appropriate place to conclude our discussion of the praxis of water baptism. Here baptism is the antitype of the Noachic flood—through which some few were saved, but most were judged and lost. Thus, water symbolizes a redemptive judgment in that passage, as it does in Rom. 6 where the old person is judged but the new person is saved. What is unique about this passage is that we are told something about how baptism saves: “not the removal of dirt from the flesh, but the appeal unto God for a good conscience (or possibly a Christian life).” The grammar is complex here but the word “baptism” comes right before these two clauses explain what baptism is, not how it saves, which only comes at the end of the verse in the “through” clause. (Ben Witherington III, Biblical Theology: The Convergence of the Canon [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019], 430-31)

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Email for Logos.com Gift Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com

Blog Archive