Monday, February 17, 2025

Popes Zephyrinus (198-217) and Callistus (217-222) Teaching Sabellianism as Recorded in Refutation of All Heresies

  

KALLISTOS

 

11. 1. Kallistos validated this heresy. He was a man crafty in vice and versatile in deceit, hunting the episcopal throne for his own ends. It was he who, by convincing Zephyrinos (a man uncultivated, unlettered, and inexperienced in ecclesiastical rulings) with bribes and unending solicitations, steered the greedy bribe-taker where he wanted. He continually persuaded him to incite factions between the brothers. Later on, he fostered favor for himself among both parties “by the speeches of cheats.” By sometimes claiming in private to hold the same views as those who thought the truth, he deceived them, all the while doing likewise with those who agreed with Sabellios’s teachings.

 

It was he too who drove Sabellios away, though he could have corrected him. 2. For when I admonished Sabellios, he was not hardened. But when Sabellios spent time alone with Kallistos, he was spurred by him to incline to the dogma of Kleomenes (since Kallistos claimed to share those views). At that time, Sabellios did not realize Kallistos’s dissemblance. Later, however, he realized it, as I will soon relate.

 

3. Kallistos led Zephyrinos himself astray. He persuaded him to declare publicly: “I know one God Christ Jesus, and beside him no other who is born and subject to suffering.” At other times, he persuaded him to say: “The Father did not die, but the Son.” In this way he kept the discord among the people unchecked.

 

Knowing his thoughts, I did not give ground to him but exposed and opposed him on behalf of the truth. But he—going mad because everybody flocked to his theater performance (except my party)—denounced us as “ditheists,” thus violently vomiting out the poison lurking within him. 4. Therefore, beloved, I think it right to present his life, since he was our contemporary, so that through exposing the behavior of such a person, his contrived heresy might at once become well recognized and clear to people of intelligence. He became a confessor when Fuscianus was prefect of Rome.56 The mode of his confession was as follows. (Refutation of All Heresies 9.11.1-4, in, Refutation of All Heresies [trans. M. David Litwa; Writings from the Greco-Roman World; Atlanta: SBL Press, 2016], 643, 645)

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Email for Logos.com Gift Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com

Blog Archive