Saturday, February 8, 2025

Terrance L. Tiessen on Irenaeus's Belief in Genuine Free-Will After the Fall

  

The human free choice of personal destiny

 

It was in response to the fatalistic determinism implicit in the threefold division of the Gnostics that Irenaeus stressed human freedom to choose between two possible destinies. In the Gnostic scheme, only the psychical had any choice. For Irenaeus, the justice of God's condemnation of people rests on the fact that they have been endowed with reason and free will. Although the Lord used the separation of wheat and chaff at harvest time as an illustration of judgment, there is an important difference between the illustration and reality. The wheat and the chaff are inanimate and irrational, and were by nature what they were. Human beings, on the other hand, have the power to decide whether they will become "wheat" or "chaff." Should they choose to be chaff, their condemnation would be just, because they made a free choice, even though it was an irrational one (AH IV,4,3).

 

From the beginning, humans were created free, with power over their own souls, so that they could obey God’s precepts of their own volition, and not by any compulsion from God. God’s will or purpose toward humanity is always good and he gives good counsel (consilium bonum or gnomēn agathēn) to all, but people must give obedience to God and preserve that good which is given to them by God. They have the power to do good and will be justly condemned if they do not do it (AH IV,37,1). Lawson has remarked that Irenaeus was so dominated by the interest in human personal moral choice “that his statements on free will sometimes sound almost Pelagian.”’ He rightly notices, however, that, in the preceding context of this statement regarding human ability to do the good, the grace of God (his good will or counsel) precedes human working. “That ‘working of good’ which is within human power would therefore appear to be nothing other than a steadfast holding on to the grace of God.”

 

While Irenaeus clearly affirmed the necessity of God’s grace prior to human choice of the good and the decision of faith in God, he did not consider that grace efficacious in a predestinarian sense. God’s foreknowledge of all things includes a knowledge of who will and who will not believe, but it is not elective or reprobationary (AH IV,29,2; cf. AH IV,37,2; IV,39,4). How people respond to God’s grace is left in the power of their own freedom. Faith in God is within human power, and they choose to believe or not to do so, of their own free will (AH IV,37,5). When people do not believe, the cause does not lie in a deficiency in God's call. God's light continues to shine but some people blind themselves to it. That they live in darkness is therefore their own fault and no fault of God's light (AH IV,39,3-4). However, God does judicially blind these unbelievers, giving them up to the darkness which they have chosen for themselves (AH IV,29,1;

IV,39,4; III,7,1; V,27,2).

 

It needs to be noted again that this stress which Irenaeus places on human freedom to choose personal destiny is in a context of optimism regarding the opportunity provided for choice of the good. From the beginning, the Son has been present with his handiwork, revealing the Father to all whom the Father wills (AH IV,6,7). This included the revelation in creation, the preaching through the law and the prophets, the visibility of the Word in the incarnation, and then the continuing working of the Word through the Church's proclamation and the inspired Scriptures. Irenaeus had no room in his experience for a category of people who have had no opportunity to believe. God's just judgment of people rests on their free response to his gracious self-revelation, and there does not seem to have been anyone, in Irenaeus's frame of reference, who did not have sufficient revelation to make an adequate moral response. (Terrance L. Tiessen, Irenaeus on the Salvation of the Unevangelized [ATLA Monograph Series 31; Metuchen, N. J.: The Scarecrow Press, Inc., 1993], 218-20)

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Email for Logos.com Gift Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com

Blog Archive