Wednesday, February 12, 2025

Early Christians Interpreting John 1:12-13 as a Reference to Rebirth (Regeneration) by Water Baptism

Commenting on John 1:12-13, Edward Pusey wrote that early Christians:

 

Not only did they understand the words " water and the Spirit" of Baptism, but they regarded them as a sort of key to the rest of Holy Scripture, which any way bore upon the same subjects. Thence they inferred, that wherever, under the law, free remission of sins was set forth, there was an intimation of that gift of Christ in the Gospel, without which a man could not " enter into the kingdom of Heaven ;" thence, also, that when, water was spoken of as cheering, cleansing, refreshing, there was a secret reference to that great mystery, wherein our Lord, by condescending to be Baptized, should " sanctify water to the mystical washing away of sin," and to the imparting of His holiness. And so of those words, (St, John i. 12. 13 " As many as received Him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, to them that believe on his name, which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God," whoso should explain them of the gift of God in Baptism, could not hesitate so to understand the words of our Lord. For this exposition is founded on the very notion, that the partaking of the Incarnation and the Christian relation of sonship to God, is imparted through Baptism, and is not imparted without it. Yet even Pelagians" understood the gift here spoken of to be realized through Baptism; and; among the Christian fathers, allusions to this text are frequent, even where our Lord's words. Are not quoted ; because this declares more positively the Christian's privilege of the birth of God: our Lord's words are spoken negatively, that no one shall see the kingdom of heaven without that birth. Controversy and error have driven us into narrower bounds, where our forefathers used to "feed freely in a large pasture." (E. B. Pusey, Scriptural Views of Holy Baptism, As Established by the Consent of the Ancient Church, and Contrasted with the Systems of Modern Schools [New York: Charles Henry, 1840], 31)

 

Examples of this “Baptism” reading of John 1:12-13 include:

 

Divine Adoption Through the Son of God. Basil the Great: When the soul has been clothed with the Son of God, it becomes worthy of the final and perfect stage and is baptized in the name of the Father himself of our Lord Jesus Christ, who, according to the testimony of John, gave the power to be made the sons of God. Concerning Baptism 1.2.

 

The Baptismal Seal of Sonship. Chrysostom: Why, then, did he not say that “he made them sons of God,” instead of “he gave them power to become sons of God”? He did so to show how much zeal is needed to keep the image of sonship that was impressed on us at baptism and to keep it all the way through without spot or soiling. At the same time, he also wanted to show that no one will be able to take this power from us, unless we first deprive ourselves of it.… For even in these mystical blessings, it is, on the one hand, God’s part, to give the grace, on the other, a person’s to supply faith. What follows needs much perseverance. In order to preserve our purity, it is not sufficient for us merely to have been baptized and to have believed; we must display a life worthy of it if we want to continually enjoy this brightness. This then is God’s work in us. Homilies on the Gospel of John 10.2–3. (John 1-10, ed. Joel C. Elowsky [Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture; Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 2006], 37)

 

But those who rise to divine sonship through faith in Christ are baptized not into anything originate but into the holy Trinity itself through the Word who is the mediator. He joins what is human to himself through the flesh that was united to him, and he is joined by nature to the Father since he is by nature God. In this way, the slaves ascend to sonship through participation in the true Son since they are called and so to speak raised to the honor that is in the Son by nature. Therefore, we who received the new birth through the Spirit by faith are called born of God, and that is what we are. (Cyril of Alexandria, Commentary on John, 2 vols. [trans. David R. Maxwell; Ancient Chrisitan Texts; Downers Grove, Ill.: IVP Academic, 2013], 1:61)

 

Pusey also provides some other examples in his own work from Leo the Great:

 

Leo, Serm. 7 de Natio. Dom:

 

“The earthly birth neither added to nor diminished the majesty of the Son of God; for an unchangeable Substance can neither be diminished nor increased. For that 'the Word was made flesh' signifieth not that the nature of God was changed into flesh, but that flesh was taken by the Word into an unity of Person, and therein the whole man was taken, with whom (within the bowels of the Virgin, quickened by the Holy Spirit and ever-virgin) the Son of God is so inseparably united, that He who, before time was, was begotten of the Essence of the Father, now, in time, is born of the Virgin's womb. For no otherwise could we be freed from the chains of eternal death, than by His becoming humbled among us, who with His own was abiding Almighty. Our Lord Jesus Christ, then, being born very man, but ceasing not to be very God, made in Himself the commencement of a new creation, and in the mould of His birth gave to the human race a spiritual beginning, so that, to abolish the infection of a carnal generation, they who were to be re-born might have an origin without any seed of sin; of whom it is said, ' who were born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of men, but of God.' What mind can comprehend this mystery? what tongue declare this grace ? Unrighteousness restored to innocence ; decay to freshness ; aliens adopted ; foreigners made heirs ! The ungodly righteous; the covetous bountiful; the incontinent chaste ; from earthly they begin to be heavenly. What is this change, but the right hand of the Most High? Since the Son of God came to destroy the works of the devil, and so incorporated us into Himself, and Himself into us, that the descent of God to the things of man, shall be the advance of man to the things of God." (E. B. Pusey, Scriptural Views of Holy Baptism, As Established by the Consent of the Ancient Church, and Contrasted with the Systems of Modern Schools [New York: Charles Henry, 1840], 45-46)

 

In this passage, Leo, as the holy festival led him, dwelt on the connection of our privilege of sonship to God, and this declaration of it by St. John with the Incarnation; in others on that both with Baptism. (Ibid., 45)

 

 

Leo, Serm. 63. de Passione Dom. c. 6

 

All -things then, which the Son of God did and taught for the reconciling of the world, we not only know in the history of past actions, but we feel in the power of present deeds. He it is, who, born of the Holy Spirit from a virgin-mother, quickens his undefiled Church with the same infused Spirit, that so by the birth of Baptism an innumerable multitude of sons of God may be born, of whom it is spoken, 'who are born not of blood,' " &c. (E. B. Pusey, Scriptural Views of Holy Baptism, As Established by the Consent of the Ancient Church, and Contrasted with the Systems of Modern Schools [New York: Charles Henry, 1840], 45)

 

 

Leo, Epist. ad Demetriad. c. 11

 

“Although all the portions of the same mystery meet together in one, what is enacted visibly is one thing, what is realized invisibly is another; nor in the Sacrament are the form and the power the same, for the form is ministered by the obedience of human agency, the power is operated by the effectualness of the Divine working. For to His might alone is it to be referred that while the outward man is washed, the inward man is changed; and of the old a new creature is formed; vessels of wrath are transformed into vessels of mercy; and the sinful flesh is changed into the body of Christ; for unholy, they are made holy; for captives free; for sons of men, sons of God, ‘who are born not of blood, &c., but of God.’” (E. B. Pusey, Scriptural Views of Holy Baptism, As Established by the Consent of the Ancient Church, and Contrasted with the Systems of Modern Schools [New York: Charles Henry, 1840], 45-46)

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Email for Logos.com Gift Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com

Blog Archive