Thursday, January 22, 2026

J. R. Soza on God "Repenting" in Numbers 23:19 and Genesis 6:6

  

We find a somewhat surprising use of repentance (niḥam) in Numbers 23:19:

 

God is not a human being, that he should lie, or a mortal, that he should change his mind [niḥam]. Has he promised, and will he not do it? Has he spoken, and will he not fulfill it? (NRSV)

 

The contradiction appears to be with passages such as Genesis 6:6, which readily describes God as repenting (niḥam). What, then, is the meaning of Numbers 23:19, which states that God does not repent (niḥam)? The passage is not a contradiction of Genesis 6:6 but rather shows that God is faithful in a way that human beings are not. Although God can and will change his mind (Gen 6:6, niḥam) about things relating to human beings and their particular attitudes and actions, there are some things about which God would never change his mind. For example, God is committed to the house of David (1 Sam 15:29; 2 Sam 7:8–17). Another example is God’s commitment to Israel via his initial covenant with Abraham (Gen. 12:1–3). It is God’s nonnegotiable commitment to Israel that is in mind here. God may change his mind about other things, but to this issue he will not. The context of Numbers 23:19 is the speeches of Balaam, who is attempting to curse Israel at the wish of Balak, king of the Moabites (Num 22:1–4). Balaam is unable to bring a curse and instead proclaims that he can only bless Israel (Num 23:20). God’s blessing of Israel is therefore seen to be irrevocable, and this immediately following the wanderings and the rebellions in the wilderness recorded throughout the book of Numbers. In this way, God is shown to be faithful to his covenant in a way that Israel was not, as witnessed in the golden calf incident of Exodus 32–34. In other words, God will not repent of those things to which he has made covenant commitments. (J. R. Soza, “Repentance,” in Dictionary of the Old Testament: Pentateuch, ed. T. Desmond Alexander and David W. Baker [Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 2003], 686, emphasis in bold added)

 

Blog Archive