Wednesday, January 21, 2026

Ian Young and Thomas J. Elms on the Common Evangelical Abuse of Deuteronomy 18 and the Test of a Prophet

  

We have seen evangelicals invoke Deuteronomy 18:22 as proof that, unless Daniel’s prophecies were literalistically fulfilled, Daniel is a false prophet. However, the fact that Deuteronomy 18’s description, of a true prophet as being evidenced by fulfillment of prophecies, does not imply a literalistic fulfillment of prophecies is evident even in a Deuteronomistic text such as Kings, for all its interest in prophecy and fulfillment. Note how, while in 1 Kings 21:19 Elijah prophesies “Thus says the LORD: ‘In the place where dogs licked up the blood of Naboth [meaning Jezreel], dogs will also lick up your blood,’” this is explicitly noted as fulfilled “according to the word of the LORD that he had spoken,” even though “they washed the chariot by the pool of Samaria; the dogs licked up his blood,” not matching the apparent thrust of the prophecy that Ahab’s punishment would hap-pen in the very place where Naboth was killed. On other occasions it is accepted a prophecy may come to nothing since God’s sovereign will might change in response to human actions. Thus in 2 Kings 20:1, Isaiah tells King Hezekiah plainly: “Thus says the LORD: ‘Set your house in order, for you shall die; you shall not recover,’” yet after Hezekiah’s prayer, this prophecy is superseded in 2 Kings 20:5–6a by “Thus says the LORD, the God of your ancestor David: ‘I have heard your prayer, I have seen your tears; indeed, I will heal you; on the third day you shall go up to the house of the LORD. I will add fifteen years to your life.’” According to the interpretation of Deuteronomy 18 as requiring literalistic fulfillment by the evangelicals mentioned above, Elijah and Isaiah must join Daniel as “false prophets.” Evangelicals must be aware of the various cases such as these of imprecise fulfillment of prophecy, but it seems a different standard of literal fulfillment is set when it comes to Daniel’s apocalyptic symbols. (Ian Young and Thomas J. Elms, “Avoiding the Apocalypse in the Book of Daniel,” in Misusing Scripture: What Are Evangelicals Doing With the Bible?, ed. Mark Elliott, Kenneth Atkinson, and Robert Rezetko [Routledge New Critical Thinking in Religion, Theology and Biblical Studies; London: Routledge, 2023], 207)

 

 

Outside Kings, there are of course various examples, such as Ezekiel 26:1-21 and 29:17-21. In the former passage, Ezekiel predicts Nebuchadnezzar’s conquest of Tyre, while in the second passage, dated 16 years later, Ezekiel admits Nebuchadnezzar’s siege failed. God now promises the Babylonians an Egyptian conquest as a consolation. As another example, a key plot element in Jonah involves an unfulfilled prophecy. (Ibid., 220 n. 27)

 

Further Reading:


Richard L. Pratt (non-LDS [Presbyterian] scholar), "Historical Contingencies and Biblical Predictions" (PDF Version)

Blog Archive