Saturday, January 17, 2026

Jacob Milgrom on Numbers 8:6-7

  

6. cleanse them Or, “have them cleansed.” The avowed purpose of the ritual is purification. Moses must see to it that the ritual is accomplished, but its execution is mainly carried out by Aaron. Herein is another distinction between the consecration of the priests and the purification of the Levites: The former ritual is conducted by Moses; however, once the priests are consecrated—and this text assumes they are—then Moses no longer has any right to officiate.

 

7. sprinkle This first rite in the purification apparently is carried out by Moses. Purification with the ashes of the red cow need not be done by a priest (19:18). The fact that this sprinkling with these special waters precedes shaving and washing indicates that its function is purely symbolic.

 

water of purification Hebrew mei ḥattaʾt. The latter word is that of the purification offering (v. 8) and refers to the ashes of the red cow, also called a ḥattʾt (19:9). Mixed with fresh water they are sprinkled (hizzah, 19:18, 19, 21) on any person or object contaminated by the dead. These waters are also called mei niddah, waters of lustration (19:9, 21; 31:23). This passage presumes knowledge of the law of chapter 19, a presumption that also underlies 5:1–4, since the expulsion of the corpse-contaminated individual from the camp also implies the person’s eventual restoration.

 

These waters cannot be drawn from the Tabernacle laver, a sanctum reserved for priestly use only (Exod. 30:17–21) and whose waters are called “holy water” (5:17), an appropriate designation because only those who themselves are holy (priests) are entitled to partake of them. The washing of the priests prior to their consecration was also done with ordinary water (Exod. 29:4; Lev. 8:6).

 

go over Close shaving is hardly intended, as shown by the absence of the verb gillaḥ used for shaving the leper (Lev. 14:8–9) and the Nazirite (6:9).

 

thus they shall he cleansed Rather, “and cleanse themselves.” Ve-hitteharu is a Hitpael and always implies bathing (cf. Gen. 35:2; Ezra 6:20). A synonymous term is hitkaddesh, “sanctify one-self” (cf. 11:18 and Excursus 27). It is obvious that for purposes of purification, laundering without bathing would be self-defeating (cf. Num. 19:19; Lev. 15:5–13). Finally, the prescribed sequence for the purification of the corpse-contaminated person is sprinkling, laundering, and bathing; bathing is also the final act in the purification of the leper (Lev. 14:8). Priests, on their consecration, also must undergo a bathing ritual (Exod. 29:4; Lev. 8:6). But in addition, and unlike the Levites, priests may not possess certain physical blemishes (Lev. 21:16–21). An Assyrian ritual for the consecration of a priest to the god Enlil provides that the priest be examined for blemishes during his ritual bath and, strikingly, moral as well as physical blemishes are included. (Jacob Milgrom, Numbers [The JPS Torah Commentary (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1990], 61-62)

 

Blog Archive