Monday, December 30, 2024

Gerald Hiestand on Creation Ex Materia in Athenagoras and Justin Martyr vs. Irenaeus' Doctrine of Creation Ex Nihilo

  

Athenagoras seems to assume the basic Platonic account of creation, where the demiurge shapes matter, rather than bringing it into existence. See Leg. 10.2f. Scholars are divided about this doctrine in Justin. The relevant passages are 1 Apol. 1.10, 58, where Justin speaks of God shaping unformed matter. Notably, Justin does not make a statement one way or the other regarding how this unformed matter came to be. Osborne states, ‘If one looks to concepts rather than to words…. it is clear that Justin would never have considered the concept of unoriginated matter because it contradicted his central belief about God, the sole unoriginate’ (Irenaeus, 67). That Irenaeus so clearly articulates a doctrine of creation ex nihilo where Justin fails to do so shows that Irenaeus is willing to push beyond Justin, despite the close association of their thought. (Gerald Hiestand, “'Passing Beyond the Angels': The Interconnection Between Irenaeus' Account of the Devil and His Doctrine of Creation” [PhD Thesis; University of Reading, October, 2017], 46 n. 38)

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Email for Logos.com Gift Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com

Blog Archive