8. The history of Eusebius of Pamphilius is apocryphal.
The works of Tertullian are apocryphal.
The works of Lactantius are apocryphal.
The works of Africanus are apocryphal.
The works of Posthumianus and Gallus are apocryphal.
The works of Montanus, Priscilla and Maximilla are apocryphal.
All the works of Faustus the Manichee are apocryphal.
The works of Commodian are apocryphal.
The works of the other Clement of Alexandria are
apocryphal. . . . (Gelasius, Letter 42, in The Letters of Gelasius I
(492-496): Pastor and Micro-manager of the Church of Rome [trans. Bronwen
Neil and Pauline Allen; Adnotationes: Commentaries on Early Christian and
Patristic Texts; Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols, 2014], 166)
The identity of this second
Clement of Alexandria is uncertain. (Ibid., 166 n. 91)
This stood out as it shows
there were at least two people with the appellation of “Clement of Alexandria”
To Support this Blog:
Email for Amazon Gift
card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com
Email for Logos.com Gift
Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com
